首页
登录
职称英语
"Opinion" is a word that is used carelessly today. It is used to refer to ma
"Opinion" is a word that is used carelessly today. It is used to refer to ma
游客
2024-01-25
50
管理
问题
"Opinion" is a word that is used carelessly today. It is used to refer to matters of taste, belief, and judgment. This casual use would probably cause little confusion if people didn’t attach too much importance to opinion. Unfortunately, most attach great importance to it. "I have as much right to my opinion as you to yours," and "Everyone’s entitled to his opinion," are common expressions. In fact, anyone who would challenge another’s opinion is likely to be branded intolerant.
Is that label accurate? Is it intolerant to challenge another’s opinion? It depends on what definition of opinion you have in mind. For example, you may ask a friend "what do you think of the new Ford cars?" And he may reply, "In my opinion, they’re ugly." In this case, it would not only be intolerant to challenge his statement, but foolish. For it’s obvious that by opinion he means his personal preference, a matter of taste. And as the old saying goes, "It’s pointless to argue about matters of taste."
But consider this very different use of the term. A newspaper reports that the Supreme Court has delivered its opinion in a controversial case. Obviously the justices did not show their personal preferences, their mere likes and dislikes. They stated their considered judgment, painstakingly arrived at after thorough inquiry and deliberation.
Most of what is referred to as opinion falls somewhere between these two extremes. It is not an expression of taste. Nor is it careful judgment. Yet it may contain elements of both. It is a view or belief more or less casually arrived at, with or without examining the evidence.
Is everyone entitled to his opinion? Of course, this is not only permitted, but guaranteed. We are free to act on our opinions only so long as, in doing so, we do not harm others. [br] According to the author, who of the following would be most possibly labeled as intolerant?
选项
A、Someone who turns a deaf ear to others’ opinions.
B、Someone who can’t put up with others’ tastes.
C、Someone who values only his own opinions.
D、Someone whose opinions harm other people.
答案
B
解析
推理判断题。本题考查对复合句的理解。根据第2段的倒数第3句…not only be intolerant…,but…和最后一句可知作者认为最有可能被认为心胸狭窄的就是不能忍受别人的偏好。选项A、C无原文依据;选项D在文中最后一段有提及,但作者要表明的是我们依据自己看法行事的前提不给别人带来伤害。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3392165.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]W:I’mgoingtogiveupplayingchess.Ilostagaintoday.M:Ju
[originaltext]W:I’mgoingtogiveupplayingchess.Ilostagaintoday.M:Ju
[originaltext]W:I’mgoingtogiveupplayingchess.Ilostagaintoday.M:Ju
[originaltext]W:I’mgoingtogiveupplayingchess.Ilostagaintoday.M:Ju
[originaltext]W:I’mgoingtogiveupplayingchess.Ilostagaintoday.M:Ju
[originaltext]M:Theweatherforecastsaysitwillraintoday.W:Yeah,doesn’t
[originaltext]W:I’mgoingtoleaveworkearlytoday.There’sadebatethiseve
[originaltext]W:I’mgoingtoleaveworkearlytoday.There’sadebatethiseve
[originaltext]W:I’mgoingtoleaveworkearlytoday.There’sadebatethiseve
[originaltext]M:Ineedahaircut.Butyoulookprettybusytoday.Doyouhave
随机试题
Entrytotheseminarisrestrictedtothosewhohavereceivedapersonal______fr
[originaltext]Themosteffectivepeoplearethesamewhethertheyarchavinga
【T1】我要跟你讲讲文学是什么!不——只是但愿能做到,可实际上我做不到。(wish)对于文学的奥秘,只能略加阐释,做点提示,仅此而已。【T2】我就试
中国主张以和平共处五项原则为基础建立国际新秩序,因为()A.它是一个既简明又比较
下列有关系统综述的说法中不正确的是()A.是客观的评价和综合某一问题的研究证
根据《计算机软件质量保证计划规范GB/T12504—1990》,()是
女性,30岁,1年前车祸造成右股骨中段闭合性粉碎型骨折,曾行持续性股骨髁上骨牵引
下列做法中,不符合合同专用章的使用规定的是()。A、只能在规定的业务范围内使用
某肝癌患者病情已到晚期,处于极度痛苦之中,自认为是肝硬化,寄希望于治疗,病情进展
某工程双代号时标网络计划如下图所示,其中工作B的总时差和自由时差()周。
最新回复
(
0
)