首页
登录
职称英语
Thinking small, being engaging, and having a sense of humor don’t hurt. Those
Thinking small, being engaging, and having a sense of humor don’t hurt. Those
游客
2024-01-23
75
管理
问题
Thinking small, being engaging, and having a sense of humor don’t hurt. Those are a few of the traits of successful science crowdfunding efforts that emerge from a recent study that examined nearly 400 campaigns. But having a large network and some promotional skills may be more crucial.
Crowdfunding, raising money for a project through online appeals, has taken off in recent years for everything from making movies to producing water-saving gadgets. Scientists have tried to tap Internet donors, too, with mixed success. Some raised more than twice their goals, but others have fallen short of reaching even modest targets.
To determine what separates science crowdfunding triumphs from failures, a team led by science communications scholar Mike Schafer of the University of Zurich examined the content of the webpages for 371 recent campaigns.
Four traits stood out for those that achieved their goals, the researchers report in Public Understanding of Science. For one, they use a crowdfunding platform that specializes in raising money for science, and not just any kind of project. Although sites like Kickstarter take all comers, platforms such as Experiment, com and Petridish. org only present scientific projects. For another, they present the project with a funny video because good visuals and a sense of humor improved success. Most of them engage with potential donors, since projects that answered questions from interested donors fared better. And they target a small amount of money. The projects included in the study raised $ 4,000 on average, with 30% receiving less than $ 1,000. The more money a project sought, the lower the chance it reached its goal, the researchers found.
Other factors may also significantly influence a project’s success, most notably, the size of a scientist’s personal and professional networks, and how much a researcher promotes a project on their own. Those two factors are by far more critical than the content on the page. Crowdfunding can be part of researchers’ efforts to reach the public, and people give because "they feel a connection to the person" who is doing the fundraising—not necessarily to the science. [br] What motivates people to donate in a crowdfunding campaign?
选项
A、The ease of access to the content of the webpage.
B、Their desire to contribute to the cause of science.
C、The significance and influence of the project itself.
D、Their feeling of connection to the scientists themselves.
答案
D
解析
推理判断题。定位句指出,众筹可以成为研究人员接触公众的努力的一部分,人们捐款是因为“他们感觉与筹款人有联系”——而不是与科学有联系。由此可见,人们捐款是因为他们感觉与科学家有联系,故答案为D)。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3388667.html
相关试题推荐
Thinkingsmall,beingengaging,andhavingasenseofhumordon’thurt.Those
Thinkingsmall,beingengaging,andhavingasenseofhumordon’thurt.Those
Ithoughthavinga
Ithoughthavinga
Ithoughthavinga
Ithoughthavinga
Ithoughthavinga
Ithoughthavinga
[originaltext]M:Joe,couldIhaveawordwithyouwhileyouarehavingyourco
[originaltext]M:Joe,couldIhaveawordwithyouwhileyouarehavingyourco
随机试题
Whichofthefollowingisnotincludedinastatementofowner’sequity?______.A
A"memorypill"thatcouldaidexamrevisionandhelptopreventpeopleforg
Attitudesaboutexpressingangervaryfromculturetoculture.Insomecultur
[originaltext]W:Hi,John.Howarethingsgoing?M:Oh,hi.Fine.Howaboutyo
张某和王某是邻居,在一起行政案件的执行中,人民法院执行人员误将案外人员王某的一间
软弱地基上荷载、高度差异大的建筑,对减小其地基沉降或不均匀沉降危害有效的处理措施
关于全国人大常委会的立法监督权,下列说法正确的是()A.全国人大常委会有权改变同
A. B. C. D. E.使稳态血药浓度控制在一定范围内的给药方案
关于社会评价中关于社会评价中利益相关者的说法,错误的是()。A.利益相关者是指
信用政策不包括()。A.信用期间 B.商品折扣 C.信用标准 D.现金折扣
最新回复
(
0
)