首页
登录
职称英语
"The Heredity Versus Environment Debate"P1 The past cen
"The Heredity Versus Environment Debate"P1 The past cen
游客
2024-01-03
25
管理
问题
"The Heredity Versus Environment Debate"
P1 The past century has seen heated controversy about whether intelligence, which relates strongly to school achievement, is determined primarily by heredity or by environment. A When
IQ
tests were undergoing rapid development early in the twentieth century, many psychologists believed that intelligence was determined primarily by heredity. B
P2 Environmentalist view. By the middle of the twentieth century, numerous studies had counteracted the hereditarian view, and most social scientists took the position that environment is as important as or even more important than heredity in determining intelligence. C Social scientists who stress the environmentalist view of intelligence generally emphasize the need for continual compensatory programs beginning in infancy. Many also criticize the use of IQ tests on the grounds that these tests are culturally biased. D
P3 James Flynn, who collected similar data on other countries, found that "massive" gains in the IQ scores of the population in fourteen nations have occurred during the twentieth century. These improvements, according to Flynn’s analysis, largely stemmed not from genetic improvement in the population but from environmental changes that ied to gains in the kinds of skills assessed by IQ tests. Torsten Husen and his colleagues also have concluded, after reviewing large amounts of data, that improvements in economic and social conditions, and particularly in the availability of schooling, can produce substantial gains in average IQ from one generation to the next. In general, educators committed to improving the performance of low-achieving students find these studies encouraging.
P4 Hereditarian view. The hereditarian view of intelligence underwent a major revival in the 1970s and 1980s, based particularly on the writings of Arthur Jensen, Richard Herrnstein, and a group of researchers conducting the Minnesota Study of Twins. Summarizing previous research as well as their own studies, these researchers identified heredity as the major factor in determining intelligence—accounting for up to 80 percent of the variation in IQ scores.
P5 Jensen published a highly controversial study in the Harvard Educational Review in 1969. Pointing out that African-Americans averaged about 15 points below whites on IQ tests, Jensen attributed this gap to a genetic difference between the two races in learning abilities and patterns. Critics countered Jensen’s arguments by contending that a host of environmental factors that affect IQ, including malnutrition and prenatal care are difficult to measure and impossible to separate from hereditary factors. IQ tests are biased, they said, and do not necessarily even measure intelligence. After his 1969 article, Jensen has continued to cite data that he believed link intelligence primarily to heredity. His critics continue to respond with evidence that environmental factors, and schooling in particular, have a major influence on IQ.
P6 Synthesizers’ view. Certain social scientists have taken a middle, or "synthesizing," position in this controversy. The synthesizers’ view of intelligence holds that both heredity and environment contribute to differences in measured intelligence. For example, Christopher Jencks, after reviewing a large amount of data, concluded that heredity is responsible for 45 percent of the IQ variance, environment accounts for 35 percent, and interaction between the two ("interaction" meaning that particular abilities thrive or wither in specific environments) accounts for 20 percent. Robert Nichols reviewed all these and other data and concluded that the true value for heredity may be anywhere between 0.40 and 0.80 but that the exact value has little importance for policy. In general, Nichols and other synthesizers maintain that heredity determines the fixed limits of a range; within those limits, the interaction between environment and heredity yields the individual’s intelligence. In this view, even if interactions between heredity and environment limit our ability to specify exactly how much of a child’s intelligence reflects environmental factors, teachers (and parents) should provide each child with a productive environment in which to realize her or his maximum potential.
Glossary
IQ: intelligence quotient; a numerical value for intelligence [br] Based on the information in paragraph 6, which of the following best explains the term "synthesizing"?
选项
A、A moderate position between the two extremes
B、A position for which the evidence is overwhelming
C、A controversial position that is hotly debated
D、A modern revision of an outdated position
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3329671.html
相关试题推荐
Inanageofincreasingenvironmentalsensitivity,conventionalplasticsmade
NarratorListentopartofatalkinanenvironmentalscienceclass.
NarratorListentopartofatalkinanenvironmentalscienceclass.
NarratorListentopartofatalkinanenvironmentalscienceclass.
NarratorListentopartofatalkinanenvironmentalscienceclass.
NarratorListentopartofatalkinanenvironmentalscienceclass.
NarratorListentopartofatalkinanenvironmentalscienceclass.
NarratorListentopartofalectureabouttheenvironmentstudyinBiramichiRi
NarratorListentopartofalectureabouttheenvironmentstudyinBiramichiRi
NarratorListentopartofatalkinanenvironmentalscienceclass.Nowgetrea
随机试题
Oldage,evenincultureswhereitis(i)______,isoftenviewedwith(ii)______
患者,男,38岁。患急性子痈2天,恶寒发热,左侧睾丸肿大疼痛,疼痛引及精索,舌红
地黄的主产地是A.河南 B.湖北 C.湖南 D.河北
苏子降气汤的组成药物中含有A.干姜、茯苓 B.当归、大黄 C.半夏、生
半卧位的目的不包括A、利于引流 B、利于呼吸 C、利于循环 D、防止膈下脓
角色失败是指角色承担者被证明已经不可能再继续承担或者履行该角色的权利和义务,不得
社会监督是指()A.任何单位和个人都有权向城乡规划主管部门或者其他有关部门举
某技术复杂,招标金额为1000万元的政府采购货物招标项目,其评标委员会的组成正确
A.溶血性黄疸 B.胆汁淤积性黄疸 C.肝细胞性黄疸 D.肝细胞摄取非结合
一定时期内所有交易或事项全部记入账户后,若记账无误,所有账户的借方发生额合计与贷
最新回复
(
0
)