首页
登录
职称英语
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal
游客
2023-12-29
43
管理
问题
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their (1) or their residency. But the proposal is set to (2) because of the very different laws on divorce that apply across the EU. The Commission wants to (3) problems over which law to apply when, for example, a married couple from one member state is (4) in another member state or when the couple is of different EU nationalities.
The (5) of member states are said to be (6) the idea and responded positively to a (6) which followed the (8) of a Commission Green Paper. With 15 percent of German divorces each year involving couples of different nationalities, the government of Berlin (9) see resolved the issue of which laws should apply.
But some member states are expected to resist the (10) which would involve allowing different divorce laws to be applied in their countries. For example, in Ireland where the divorce law states a couple must have been separated for four years, establish that their marriage has broken down and be offered (11) , a couple from Sweden could apply to an Irish court to allow them to divorce under Swedish law, where divorce can be (12) quickly.
The Irish government’s (13) to the Commission on the Green Paper stated: "Ireland is not in favor of allowing (14) to choose the applicable law, as this could be open to abuse.., such abuse would be likely to (15) most on divorce regimes, such as that of Ireland, which require a relatively long separation period." Ireland, like the UK, however, is allowed to choose whether to "opt-in" to such a proposal under rules agreed in the Amsterdam treaty. Malta has no such (16) but could (17) the proposal in the Council of Ministers since (18) approval will be required.
"It is going to lead to (19) ," said Geoffrey Shannon, Irish expert on the Commission on European Family Law, which examines the (20) of EU family law.
The proposal would also mean that judges would have to be trained in the divorce law of all 25 member states. [br]
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their nationalities or their residency. But the proposal is set to run into difficulties because of the very different laws on divorce that apply across the EU.
The Commission wants to clear up problems over which law to apply when, for example, a married couple from one member state is resident in another member state or when the couple is of different EU nationalities.
The majority of member states are said to be in favor of the idea and responded positively to a consultation which followed the publication of a Commission Green Paper. With 15 percent of German divorces each year involving couples of different nationalities, the government of Berlin is particularly keen to see resolved the issue of which laws should apply.
But some member states are expected to resist the proposal which would involve allowing different divorce laws to be applied in their countries. For example, in Ireland where the divorce law states a couple must have been separated for four years, establish that their marriage has broken down and be offered mediation, a couple from Sweden could apply to an Irish court to allow them to divorce under Swedish law, where divorce can be obtained quickly.
The Irish government’s submission to the Commission on the Green Paper stated, "Ireland is not in favor of allowing spouses to choose the applicable law, as this could be open to abuse.., such abuse would be likely to impact most on divorce regimes, such as that of Ireland, which require a relatively long separation period."
Ireland, like the UK, however, is allowed to choose whether to "opt-in" to such a proposal under rules agreed in the Amsterdam treaty. Malta has no such safeguard but could veto the proposal in the Council of Ministers since unanimous approval will be required.
"It is going to lead to a two-tier situation," said Geoffrey Shannon, Irish expert on the Commission on European Family Law, which examines the harmonization of EU family law.
The proposal would also mean that judges would have to be trained in the divorce law of all 25 member states.
选项
答案
impact
解析
动词。本题考查动词搭配。根据上下文含义及空格后的介词on的运用可知,这里应填impact。impact…on意为“对……有影响”。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3316879.html
相关试题推荐
Theabsenceofno-faultdivorceinEnglandandWaleslooksupdated.Peoplest
Theabsenceofno-faultdivorceinEnglandandWaleslooksupdated.Peoplest
Theabsenceofno-faultdivorceinEnglandandWaleslooksupdated.Peoplest
Theabsenceofno-faultdivorceinEnglandandWaleslooksupdated.Peoplest
"Itispainingtowatchpeoplesufferingfromwhatishappeningintheregionof
Afterstayinginthisoldtownforsixmonths,Lucyfoundthatpeoplewholivei
Iknowwhatyouwilljoinmeinexpressingourdeepcondolencestothepeopleof
Thesensibleplacetobuildnewhouses,factoriesandofficesiswhopeopleare,
Whenstruckoutfornewlands,however,peopleshouldestablishnewguidelinest
Thefreemovementofpeopleandgoodsisundertheattack,threatenedbyagrowi
随机试题
他除了发财之外别无他愿。Hehasnodesirebuttomakeafortune.//Hehasnootherdesiretha
【T1】一年前,世界各国政府为今后15年商定了一项雄心勃勃的可持续发展议程。(agreeon)他们认识到,人民的需求不太复杂,但的确需要改变我们经济和社会的运
Oldagehasalwaysbeenthoughtofastheworstagetobe;butitisnot【11】
手车、抽屉式成套配电柜推拉应灵活,无卡阻碰撞现象。动触头与静触头的中心线应一致,
下列哪项不是中医辨证论治的主要辩证方法()A.脏腑辨证 B.八纲辨证 C
(2017年)关于行政复议参加人的说法,正确的是( )。A.被申请人可以委托本机
病侧呼吸动度减弱伴叩诊为鼓音、呼吸音消失者,见于A.肺实变 B.肺气肿
共用题干 患者女性,急性阑尾炎合并穿孔,急诊在硬膜外麻醉下行阑尾切除术,术中顺
当教师把关注的焦点投向提高学生的成绩时,这个阶段是( )。A.关注生存阶段
某补偿器优点是制造方便、补偿能力大、轴向推力小、维修方便、运行可靠;缺点是占地面
最新回复
(
0
)