首页
登录
职称英语
As with any work of art, the merit of Chapman KelleyV’Wildflower Works I" wa
As with any work of art, the merit of Chapman KelleyV’Wildflower Works I" wa
游客
2023-12-27
4
管理
问题
As with any work of art, the merit of Chapman KelleyV’Wildflower Works I" was in the eye of the beholder.
Kelley, who normally works with paint and canvas, considered the twin oval gardens planted in 1984 at Daley Bicentennial Park his most important piece.
The Chicago Park District considered it a patch of raggedy vegetation on public property that could be dug up and replanted at will like the flower boxes along Michigan Avenue. And that’s what happened in June 2004, when the district decided to create a more orderly vista for pedestrians crossing from Millennium Park via the new Frank Gehry footbridge.
If you’re looking for evidence that the
rubes
who run the Park District don’t know art when they see it, all you have to do is visit what’s left of Kelley’s masterpiece. The exuberant 1. 5-acre tangle of leggy wildflowers is now
confined
to a tidy rectangle, restrained on all sides by a knee-high hedge and surrounded by a closely cropped lawn. White hydrangeas and pink shrub roses complete the look. We don’t know who’s responsible for the redesign, but We’ll bet the carpet in his home doesn’t go with the furniture.
Still, you’d think the Park District Was within its rights to plow under the prairie. Wrong. Kelley just won at lawsuit in which he argued that the garden was public are and therefore protected by the federal Visual Artists Rights Act. Under that law, the district should have given him 90 days’ notice that it intended to
mess with
his artwork instead of rushing headlong into the demolition, a la Meigs Field. That way Kelley could have mounted a legal challenge, or at least removed the plants.
Park District officials said they never considered the garden a work of art, even though it was installed by an established artist and not, say, Joe’s Sod and Landscaping. We can understand their confusion. Just recently, we figured out that the caged greenery directly south of Pritzker Pavilion is supposed to be an architectural statement and not a Christmas tree lot.
All that’s left is for the district to
compensate
Kelley for his loss. Whatever price the parties settle on, let’s hope the agreement also provides for the removal of the rest of "Wildflower Works I. If it was’t an eyesore before—and plenty of people thought it was... it sure is now. [br] Which of the following was NOT true about "Wildflower Works I"?
选项
A、It was designed by the famous artist Chapman Kelley.
B、There are two oval gardens at Daley Bicentennial Park.
C、The public voted for demolishing the gardens.
D、The Chicago Park District did not deem it a piece of art.
答案
C
解析
C项“群众投票拆除花园”在文中没有出现相关内容,所以此说法不正确,符合题意。A项“野花工程I是由著名艺术家查普曼·凯利设计的”,这在文中第一段就已说明;B项内容在第二段后半部分有所体现;D项“芝加哥公园区不把它当作一种艺术”,这在第三段开头有相关内容,所以这三项都符合文意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3308909.html
相关试题推荐
Chapman,thestate’smedicalexaminer,proposedanintravenousdripto______dea
Aswithanyworkofart,themeritofChapmanKelleyV’WildflowerWorksI"wa
Aswithanyworkofart,themeritofChapmanKelleyV’WildflowerWorksI"wa
Aswithanyworkofart,themeritofChapmanKelleyV’WildflowerWorksI"wa
Aswithanyworkofart,themeritofChapmanKelleyV’WildflowerWorksI"wa
Aswithanyworkofart,themeritofChapmanKelleyV’WildflowerWorksI"wa
Aswithanyworkofart,themeritofChapmanKelleyV’WildflowerWorksI"wa
Aswithanyworkofart,themeritofChapmanKelleyV’WildflowerWorksI"wa
Aswithanyworkofart,themeritofChapmanKelleyV’WildflowerWorksI"wa
Aswithanyworkofart,themeritofChapmanKelleyV’WildflowerWorksI"wa
随机试题
[originaltext]Recently,aprofessorofphilosophyintheUnitedStateshas
[originaltext]M:ThereareadvertisementseverywherehereinHongKong.Thecit
SuccessPersonalityAccordingtoaGallupsurvey,a
Theyhave______tocoverbothofthem.A、toosmallanumbrellaB、verysmallanu
It’sanannualback-to-schoolroutine.Onemorningyouwavegoodbye,andth
A.1个月 B.2个月 C.4个月 D.7个月 E.12个月添加淀粉类食
理气药的解痉作用与下面哪个作用机制无关()。A.兴奋M受体B.兴奋α受体C.阻
根据材料,以下说法正确的有( )条。 ①2020年上半年,新疆风电装
(2020年真题)依据企业所得税同期资料管理规定,下列年度关联交易金额应当准备本
甲企业销售给乙企业一批货物,约定在当月支付货款,至月底乙企业因资金紧张无法支付,
最新回复
(
0
)