2. 职称英语
  3. Walking through my train yesterday, staggering from my seat to the buffet an

Walking through my train yesterday, staggering from my seat to the buffet an

游客2023-12-27  49
问题     Walking through my train yesterday, staggering from my seat to the buffet and back, I counted five people reading Harry Potter novels. Not children-these were real grown-ups reading children’s books.
    Maybe that would have been understandable. If these people had jumped whole-heartedly into a second childhood it would have made more sense. But they were card-carrying grown-ups with laptops and spreadsheets returning from sales meetings and seminars. Yet they chose to read a children’s book.
    I don’t imagine you’ll find this headcount exceptional. You can no longer get on the London Tube and not see a Harry Potter book. Nor is it just the film; these throwback readers were out there in droves long before the movie campaign opened.
    So who are these adult readers who have made JK Rowling the second-biggest female earner in Britain(after Madonna)? As I have tramped along streets knee-deep in Harry Potter paperbacks, I’ve mentally slotted them into three groups.
    First come the Never-Readers, whom Harry has enticed into opening a book. Is this a bad thing? Probably not. Writing has many advantages over film, but it can never compete with its magnetic punch. If these books can re-establish the novel as a thrilling experience for some people, then this can only be for the better. If it takes obsession-level hype to lure them into a bookshop, that’s fine by me. But will they go on to read anything else? Again, we can only hope.
    The second group are the Occasional Readers. These people claim that tiredness, work and children allow them to read only a few books a year. Yet now—to be part of the crowd, to say they’ve read it—they put Harry Potter on their oh-so-select reading list. It’s infuriating, and maddening. Yes, I’m a writer myself, currently writing difficult, unreadable, hopefully unsettling novels, but there are so many other good books out there, so much rewarding, enlightening, enlarging works of fiction for adults; and yet these sad cases are swept along by the hype, the faddism, into reading a children’s book.
    The third group are the Regular Readers, for whom Harry is sandwiched between McEwan(英国当代作家)and Balzac, Roth(德国现代诗人)and Dickens. This is the real baffler—what on earth do they get out of reading it? Why bother? But if they call rattle through it in a week just to say they ve been there—like going to Longleat(郎利特山庄英国名胜)or the Eiffel Tower—the worst they’re doing is encouraging others. [br] According to the author, the Never-Readers______.
选项 A、will take up reading as their lifelong hobby
B、have got more from the book than from the film
C、may barely get interested in other books than Harry Potter
D、can hardly be driven by the crowds to read any book
答案 C
解析 根据文中第五段的内容“But will they go on to read anything else?Again，we can on—ly hope．但他们还会去读别的书吗?我们只能拭目以待了。”可以看出作者对于这类读者会从此回归小说不抱乐观态度，所以C项符合题意。A项“将把阅读作为终身的习惯”，B项“从书中比在电影中得到了更多”，A、B在文中都没有提到，D项“几乎不能被大众驱赶着去读任何书”，显然不正确，因为他们读《哈利·波特》就是在大众的驱使下。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3308798.html
相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)