首页
登录
职称英语
For nearly a century, two United States governmental agencies, the United St
For nearly a century, two United States governmental agencies, the United St
游客
2023-12-25
8
管理
问题
For nearly a century, two United States governmental agencies, the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the Bureau of Reclamation, have constructed dams to store water and to generate electricity. Building these dams provided cheap electricity, created jobs for workers, stimulated regional economic development, and allowed farming on lands that would otherwise be too dry. But not everyone agrees that big dam projects are entirely beneficial. Their storage reservoirs stop the flow of rivers and often submerge towns, farms, and historic sites. They prevent fish migrations and change aquatic habitats essential for native species.
The tide may have turned, in fact, against dam building. In 1998 the Army Corps announced that it would no longer be building large dams. In the few remaining sites where dams might be built, public opposition is so great that getting approval for projects is unlikely. Instead, the new focus may be on removing existing dams and restoring natural habitats. In 1999 Bruce Babbitt, the then United States interior secretary, said, —Of the 75,000 large dams in the United States, most were built a long time ago and are now
obsolete
and unsafe. They were built with no consideration of the environmental costs. As operating licenses come up for renewal, dam removal and habitat restoration to original stream flows will be among the options considered.
The first active hydroelectric dam in the United States to be removed against the wishes of its owners was the 162-year-old Edwards Dam, on the Kennebec River in Augusta, Maine. For many years, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service had advocated the removal of this dam, which prevented migration of salmon, shad, sturgeon, and other fish species up the river. In a precedent-setting decision, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ordered the dam removed after concluding that the environmental and economic benefits of a free-flowing river outweighed the electricity generated by the dam. In July 1999 the dam was removed and restoration work began on wetlands and stream banks long underwater.
The next dams likely to be taken down are the Elwha and Glines Dams on the Elwha River in Olympic National Park in the state of Washington. Built nearly a century ago to provide power to lumber and paper mills in the town of Port Angeles, these dams blocked access to upstream spawning beds for six species of salmon on what once was one of the most productive salmon rivers in the world. Simply removing the dams will not restore the salmon, however. Where 50-kilogram king salmon once fought their way up waterfalls to lay their eggs in gravel beds, there now are only concrete walls holding back still water and deep beds of muddy deposits. Removing the mud, uncovering gravel beds where fish spawn, and finding suitable salmon types to rebuild the population is a daunting task. Congress will have to appropriate somewhere around $300 to $400 million to remove these two relatively small dams and rehabilitate the area.
Environmental groups, encouraged by these examples, have begun to talk about much more ambitious projects. Four giant dams on the Snake River in Washington State, for example, might be removed to restore salmon and steelhead fish runs to the headwaters of the Columbia River. The Hetch Hetchy Dam in Yosemite National Park might be taken down to reveal what John Muir, the founder of the prestigious environmental organization Sierra Club, called a valley—just as beautiful and worthy of preservation as the majestic Yosemite. Some groups have even suggested removing the Glen Canyon Dam on the Colorado River. In each of these cases, powerful interests stand in opposition. These dams generate low-cost electricity and store water that is needed for agriculture and industry. Local economies, domestic water supplies, and certain types of recreation all would be severely impacted by destruction of these dams. [br] According to Paragraph 1, building dams was beneficial in each of the following ways EXCEPT________.
选项
A、increasing the amount of land that could be used for farming
B、strengthening local economies
C、increasing the availability of low-cost electricity
D、expanding the aquatic habitats of native species
答案
D
解析
第1段第2句提到水坝提供了廉价的电力,而水坝建造增加了就业机会,刺激了区域经济发展,使得原本干旱的土地也可以耕种了,因此A项“耕地面积增加”、B项“促进当地经济”和C项“提供更多廉价的电力”均是水坝的利处。另外,该段最后一句提到水库阻碍了鱼类迁徙、改变了当地物种赖以生存的水生栖息地,因此D项“扩大本地物种的水生环境”与文中表述不符,且不是水坝建造的益处,符合题意,故选。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3304420.html
相关试题推荐
HowmuchmoneydoestheUnitedStatesintendtoprovidetobuildsecondaryschoo
Whatwasthemajormissionofpeacekeepersinthepast?[originaltext]United
Itwasduringthe21stcenturythataveragepeoplewereabletoundertaketravel
E-cigarettesappearedintheUnitedStatesfor42years.A、正确B、错误B原文说:E-cigaret
TheUnitedStatesPostalService,orUSPS,hasbeguntestswithself-drivingtru
DiningroomsaredisappearingfromrestaurantsintheUnitedStates,asmoreand
WhenevertheUnitedStatesgovernmentoranyofficeroragencythereofshallpro
TheSenateoftheUnitedStatesshallbecomposedoftwoSenatorsfromeachStat
InnearlyeverycasethefirstblackBritonstomovetotheUKdidsooftheiro
Tobeeffectiveinthe21stcentury,educationalinstitutionswillhavetobecom
随机试题
[originaltext]Scientistshaveobservedthat[19]plantsthemselvesproducem
“中国梦”(ChineseDream)是一个新名词,于2012年由习近平主席首次提出。“中国梦”实质上指要实现中华民族的复兴(rejuvenation
男性,26岁,突起寒战、高热、咳嗽、胸痛,痰中带血丝,伴恶心、食欲不振,吸烟6年
下列UCITS三号指令对基金管理公司提出的最低资本要求中,说法错误的是( )。
(2019年真题)有甲、乙、丙、丁四个投资者,均申报买进X股票,申报价格和申报时
共用题干 “Lucky”LordLucan一AliveorDeadOn
避孕原理为抑制排卵的避孕方法是A.药物避孕 B.安全期避孕 C.阴茎套 D
患者,男性,近3个月来排便次数增多,每天3~4次,黏液脓血便,有里急后重感。首选
在城市供水工程规划的管网水力计算中,为简化计算,配水管网的管径计算通常只限于(
缺乏共情容易造成的后果包括() A.求助者感到失望 B.求助者停止自
最新回复
(
0
)