首页
登录
职称英语
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric p
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric p
游客
2023-12-23
69
管理
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a causal link" between extremely low- frequency electromagnetic fields those having very longwave-lengths--and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer. While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as "a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans. "
The report is no reason to panic--or even to lose sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilovolts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is far from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report. " Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane. [br] It can be inferred from physical phenomenon ______.
选项
A、the force of the electromagnetic field is too weak to be harmful
B、the force of the electromagnetic field is weaker than the electric field that the cells generate
C、electromagnetic field may affect health
D、only more powerful radiation can knock electron out of human body
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3298587.html
相关试题推荐
Manyoftheelectricandelectronicproductswepurchaseandconsumetodayarew
Modernindustrialsocietygrantslittlestatustooldpeople.Infact,such
Modernindustrialsocietygrantslittlestatustooldpeople.Infact,such
Modernindustrialsocietygrantslittlestatustooldpeople.Infact,such
Atthebeginningofthetwentiethcentury,NorthAmericansocietyheld,asa
Atthebeginningofthetwentiethcentury,NorthAmericansocietyheld,asa
Atthebeginningofthetwentiethcentury,NorthAmericansocietyheld,asa
Atthebeginningofthetwentiethcentury,NorthAmericansocietyheld,asa
Atthebeginningofthetwentiethcentury,NorthAmericansocietyheld,asa
Atthebeginningofthetwentiethcentury,NorthAmericansocietyheld,asa
随机试题
(1)LuoZheng,28,anofficeworkerinChangsha,Hunanprovince,stillpines
女性,33岁,既往体健。多尿,口渴多饮2周,每日饮水约6~7L。尿比重1.000
关于代理的法律责任的说法,下列选项中正确的是()。A、委托书授权不明的,被代理人
患者自然分娩3小时,突然头晕眼花,不能起坐,恶心呕吐,痰涌气急,心烦不安,渐至不
下述关于颗粒剂质量要求叙述正确的是()。 A.外观应干燥,颗粒大小均匀,色泽一
房屋登记机构询问当事人的结果应经当事人(),并予以保留。A:以文字形式记载 B
下边四个图形中,只有一个是由上边的四个图形拼合(只能通过上、下、左、右平移)而成
患者,男,40岁。8小时前开始出现上腹剧烈疼痛。查体:上腹部有压痛。此时对确诊价
关于公共物品生产的说法,错误的是()。A.政府生产是指代表公众利益的政治
下列炉窑中,适用《工业炉窑大气污染物排放标准》的是( )。A.铅熔炼炉 B.
最新回复
(
0
)