首页
登录
职称英语
A major study of the grocery-buying habits of millions of Americans released
A major study of the grocery-buying habits of millions of Americans released
游客
2023-12-21
14
管理
问题
A major study of the grocery-buying habits of millions of Americans released late last year found that people using food stamps generally make the same unhealthy food choices as everyone else in America. Too many sweets, salty snacks and prepared desserts, junk food, in other words. But when it came to soda and its sugary ilk, the results were more surprising, and not in a good way. According to the USDA-funded study, shoppers using food stamps spent a larger share of their budget—9.25% to be exact—on sugar-sweetened beverages than other shoppers. Even more startling: Food-stamp shoppers bought more soda than any other single grocery item.
The new data revived an old debate about banning soda from the $71-billion food-stamp program. In February, the House Agriculture Committee held a hearing to gather testimony about the pros and cons of such a restriction. It does seem counterproductive to spend billions of taxpayer dollars in an effort to improve the nutrition of low-income Americans on a product with little or no nutritional value. It is called the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, after all. And soda had been identified as one of the prime culprits in soaring U.S. obesity and Type 2 diabetes rates.
The study and committee debate raised some of the same uncomfortable issues that have caused the proposal to languish in the past. On the conservative side, folks have worried that this type of nannystate regulation will lead to other heavy-handed health-related restrictions. Liberals, meanwhile, have been concerned that it is patronizing and punitive to tell people how to spend their government benefits. Add in the opposition from beverage industry lobby and it’s no surprise this idea hasn’t gotten very far when it’s been proposed. In recent years, a handful of states and cities have tried to impose such a requirement, but were blocked by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
The difference now is that the attitude toward soda has rapidly soured as more evidence has poured in that beverages with added sugars are making people fat and sick. The USDA has issued dietary guidelines warning people to limit their consumption of food with added sugars, the largest sources of which are sweetened beverages. This belief helped San Francisco, Philadelphia and handful of other cities push through new taxes on soda. A handful more are considering their own soda levies.
We know that there are detrimental health effects of drinking lots of soda, but we don’t know if barring SNAP recipients from spending their benefits on soda will really improve their health. It’ s worth finding out by undertaking a limited pilot program, regardless of the qualms we may have about imposing restraints on the poor that better-off Americans don’t face. The assumption is that those billions of dollars not going to buy Coke will be spent on healthier food. But that may not be the case. What if consumption of other sugary items increases? Or if SNAP recipients simply transferred their sweet drink habit ounce-for-ounce to more expensive and still sugar-laden fruit juice? Or if they spent their non-SNAP money on soda? Before making a permanent change, we need to know if it would improve nutrition or be pointlessly punitive.
But it is a good step to take to gather data. And the argument that it would be too hard on grocers to carve out sugary drinks doesn’t hold water. As the study shows, modern grocery check stand technology is sophisticated enough to easily separate out purchases by UPC code. Indeed, SNAP already comes with restrictions on alcohol, tobacco and hot foods. Grocers don’t have a problem sorting them out. The Women, Infant and Children food-assistance program is even more prescriptive, permitting only specific items to be purchased: milk, cheese, cereal and formula, for example, but absolutely nothing with added sugar or artificial sweetener. Ideally, a pilot program would also find ways to improve access to safe drinking water. Denying poor people the ability to use food aid to buy a Coke on a hot day may raise some unsettling questions. Yet the findings in the USDA’s study about excessive soda consumption shouldn’t be ignored. [br] The expression "nannystate regulation" (para.3)______.
选项
A、reveals the confrontation between the conservatives and liberals
B、displays the affirmative attitude of the conservatives
C、shows the conservatives’ contemptuous opinion towards the regulation
D、tells us the concerning and caring nature of such regulation
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3293539.html
相关试题推荐
Brainsorbeauty?Womenarestillindilemma.ApollreleasedTuesdayfound
CertainphrasesonecommonlyhearsamongAmericanswhich(1)toindividualis
CertainphrasesonecommonlyhearsamongAmericanswhich(1)toindividualis
CertainphrasesonecommonlyhearsamongAmericanswhich(1)toindividualis
CertainphrasesonecommonlyhearsamongAmericanswhich(1)toindividualis
CertainphrasesonecommonlyhearsamongAmericanswhich(1)toindividualis
CertainphrasesonecommonlyhearsamongAmericanswhich(1)toindividualis
CertainphrasesonecommonlyhearsamongAmericanswhich(1)toindividualis
CertainphrasesonecommonlyhearsamongAmericanswhich(1)toindividualis
CertainphrasesonecommonlyhearsamongAmericanswhich(1)toindividualis
随机试题
构成建筑物或构筑物本身的材料称为建筑材料。
在WORD表格中,单元格内能填写的信息A.只能是文字 B.只能是文字或符号
患者,男性,60岁。头目眩晕,耳鸣,健忘,口燥咽干,肢体麻木,腰膝酸软,头重脚轻
女,24岁,已婚,妊娠4月,肢体肿胀,肿势从足部渐发展到腿部,皮色不变,随按随起
微囊的制备方法中属于物理机械法的是A.液中干燥法 B.界面缩聚法 C.喷雾干
A.增高最早 B.增高稍晚 C.增高最晚 D.不增高 E.持续增高急性胰
下列句子中,没有语病的是().A.春节期间,全市工商系统严格执行值班制度和纪律
下列关于灭火器的设置说法中,错误的是()。A.灭火器应设置在位置明显和便于取用的
商业银行应当依法保护存款人权益,下列行为没有做到依法保护存款人合法权益的是(
电气与仪表设备安装 在禁烟的场所,应安装的感烟式火灾自动探测器为()。
最新回复
(
0
)