首页
登录
职称英语
On July 7th, I was traveling in London. I was having breakfast at a hotel very
On July 7th, I was traveling in London. I was having breakfast at a hotel very
游客
2023-12-15
46
管理
问题
On July 7th, I was traveling in London. I was having breakfast at a hotel very near Liverpool Street Station when the first explosion was detonated. Hearing the sirens and seeing London’s emergency personnel respond to the bombings brought back vivid memories of the events of Sept. 11, 2001.
People have not forgotten Sept. 11, 2001. Americans can still recall exactly where they were and what they were doing on that fateful day. But it’s understandable that some remember it as historical fact, lacking the painful impact and immediacy they originally felt. If we allow a dimming of purpose—to eliminate terrorism—these terrorist attacks in London serve as another chilling reminder that we’re still at war.
Something constructive emerges from these tragic, horrible and unexplainable attacks. It is the message that we must remain vigilant in opposing an enemy who intentionally targets innocent civilians.
Since Sept. 11, 2001, the civilized nations of the world have remained mostly united in opposing these despicable, wanton acts of terror. We have had some great successes in that effort. We have arrested perpetrators and plotters, and we have foiled planned attacks. We have reduced the power and scope of those who despise freedom and democracy.
The effort must continue. As we learned Thursday—and in Madrid and Bali—the enemies of freedom have not lost their resolve. We must not lose ours.
Ultimately, the only real defense from terrorist attacks is being able to find out about them in advance. Intelligence gathering has improved but needs to be even stronger, including consistently improving human intelligence and patrol. Police and ordinary citizens must be alert and encouraged to convey information.
Once a terrorist incident does occur, there’s no such thing as a perfect response. By definition, a terrorist attack means people are being hurt or killed. But by studying the response to past attacks, we can better prepare to handle those in the future.
London is one of the most secure cities in the world, steeped in years of dealing with terrorism. The city’s preparation and resolve was evident on Thursday. I am very impressed by London’s reaction to the bombings. Both the emergency personnel and the citizens seemed prepared. The first responders were rapid, well-directed, organized and professional, in accordance with obviously well-tested plans.
As for the citizens, at least a dozen people told me in one way or another, "We knew this was going to happen; it was just a question of when."
That is not only a realistic assessment; it also is a mindset that just might save lives. Political, business and community leaders are sometimes reluctant to talk about terrorism or stage drills to prepare their response because they don’t want to frighten or upset people. But that’s a mistake. People react to emergencies more effectively when they’re not shocked by them.
Tony Blair and London Mayor Ken Livingstone have made preparedness a priority, and their efforts clearly paid off during Thursday’s response to the attacks.
There’s another benefit to preparing for terrorism in advance. Part of the damage the terrorists hope to inflict is the emotional reaction in the wake of the destruction. The reason it’s called’ "terrorism" is that they want fear and its debilitating effects to linger long after the smoke has cleared.
By preparing citizens for the possibility of a terrorist attack, leaders can help minimize the emotional response in the wake of the destruction.
Finally, Thursday’s attacks demonstrate that we must remain committed to confronting and eliminating terrorism. There are those who assert that the efforts to eliminate terror are somehow provoking the terrorists. That is wrong. The terrorists have been attacking innocent people long before Sept. 11, 2001, or the wars in Afghanistan or Iraq.
Seeing Prime Minister Blair speak so forcefully, with President Bush, President Jacques Chirac and other world leaders right behind him; was encouraging. Let’s remember the unity the world shared after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
Free nations can and will disagree. But let us always remember that free people must be steadfast and resilient in defending our way of life. [br] A suitable rifle for the passage would be
选项
A、July 7th Terrorist Attack in London.
B、The war against terrorism.
C、Terrorism after Sept.11, 2001.
D、Lessons from terrorist attack in London.
答案
D
解析
本文作者从伦敦恐怖袭击开始写起,接着回顾“9.11"恐怖事件,提醒人们恐怖主义分子依然猖狂,随后用大量篇幅阐述伦敦应对此次事件给我们的经验和教训,最后作者呼吁全世界的自由民族联合起来抵抗恐怖主义。全文章体是对伦敦7月7日恐怖袭击的反思和经验总结,因此选D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3276832.html
相关试题推荐
Havingsaidallofthis,Ishould,perhaps,locatemyself.Iteachandwritea
Shestartedinthebathroom.Sheputtheshavingbrush,thedisposablerazor,
OnJuly7th,IwastravelinginLondon.Iwashavingbreakfastatahotelvery
OnJuly7th,IwastravelinginLondon.Iwashavingbreakfastatahotelvery
OnJuly7th,IwastravelinginLondon.Iwashavingbreakfastatahotelvery
OnJuly7th,IwastravelinginLondon.Iwashavingbreakfastatahotelvery
OnJuly7th,IwastravelinginLondon.Iwashavingbreakfastatahotelvery
Nowadaysmoreandmorepeoplespendtheirleisuretimetraveling,havingsigh
Theofficialresidenceofthe______isatnumber10DowningStreet,London.A、Br
Infact,today’steenagersaremisbehavingalotlessthanhisparentsdid.his——
随机试题
Singaporeisoneoftheworld’ssmallestcountriesbutitisalsooneofthe
[originaltext]W:(8)I’mlosingmysleep.Ifeeltiredandsleepyallthetime.
Accordingtothearticle,whichofthesentencecanbestdescribethedefinition
下列哪项是产生溶血反应的原因( )A.输血引起严重过敏反应所致 B.输入
患者,女,28岁。白带绵绵不止,量多质清稀。不宜选用的药物是()A.车前子
《麻醉药品和精神药品管理条例》不适用于A.麻醉药品药用原植物的种植B.麻醉药品和
某混凝土试块强度值不满足规范要求,但经法定检测单位对混凝土实体强度经过法定检测后
患者,女,46岁,反复发作上腹痛、早饱、嗳气半年,伴失眠、抑郁。经放射性核素检查
欧洲债券票面所使用的货币最主要的是()。 A.美元B.欧元C.特别提款权
案例三: 一般资料:求助者,男性,33岁,大学教师。 案例介绍:求助者博士毕
最新回复
(
0
)