首页
登录
职称英语
Towards the end of Thinking, Fast and Slow, Daniel Kahneman laments that he
Towards the end of Thinking, Fast and Slow, Daniel Kahneman laments that he
游客
2023-12-11
33
管理
问题
Towards the end of Thinking, Fast and Slow, Daniel Kahneman laments that he and his late collaborator, Amos Tversky, are often credited with showing that humans make "irrational" choices. That term is too strong, he says, to describe the variety of mental mishaps to which people systematically fall prey. Readers of his book may disagree. Mr. Kahneman, an Israeli-American psychologist and Nobel economics laureate, has delivered a full catalogue of the biases, shortcuts and cognitive illusions to which our species regularly succumbs. In doing so he makes it plain that Homo economicus the rational model of human behaviour beloved of economists—is as fantastical as a unicorn.
In one experiment described by Mr. Kahneman, participants asked to imagine that they have been given £50 behave differently depending on whether they are then told they can "keep" £20 or must "lose" £30--though the outcomes are identical. He also shows that it is more threatening to say that a disease kills "1,286 in every 10,000 people", than to say it kills "24. 14% of the population", even though the second mention is twice as deadly. Vivid language often overrides basic arithmetic.
Some findings are downright peculiar. Experimental subjects who have been "primed" to think of money, perhaps by seeing a picture of dollar bills, will act more selfishly. So if someone nearby drops some pencils, these subjects will pick up fewer than their non-primed counterparts. Even obliquely suggesting the concept of old age will inspire people to walk more slowly—though feeling elderly never crossed their mind, they will later report.
After all this the human brain looks less like a model of rationality and more like a giddy teenager; flighty, easily distracted and lacking in self-awareness. Yet this book is not a counsel of despair. Its awkward title refers to Mr. Kahneman’s two-tier model of cognition: "System 1" is quick, intuitive and responsible for the quirks and mistakes described above(and many others). "System 2", by contrast, is slow, deliberative and less prone to error. System 2 kicks in when we are faced with particularly complex problems, but much of the time it is all too happy to let the impulsive System 1 get its way.
What, then, is System 1 good for? Rather a lot, it turns out. In a world that often demands swift judgment and rapid decision-making, a creature who solely relied on deliberative thinking wouldn’t last long. Moreover, System 1 generally works well. As Mr. Kahneman says, "most of our judgments and actions are appropriate most of the time". He urges readers to counteract what he considers to be mistakes of System 1 thinking, such as the "loss aversion" that deters people from accepting favourable gambles(such as a 50-50 chance to win $200 or lose $100). He also recommends checking the performance of an investment portfolio no more than once a quarter, to limit needless anguish over short-term fluctuations and the "useless churning" of shares.
Mr. Kahneman does not dwell on the possible evolutionary origins of our cognitive biases, nor does he devote much time to considering why some people seem naturally better at avoiding error than others.
Still this book, his first for a non-specialist audience, is a profound one. As Copernicus removed the Earth from the centre of the universe and Darwin knocked humans off their biological perch, Mr. Kahneman has shown that we are not the paragons of reason we assume ourselves to be. Often hailed as the father of behavioural economics(with Tversky as co-parent), his work has influenced a range of disciplines and has even inspired some policy.
But the true consequences of his findings are only starting to emerge. When he presents the poor victims of his experiments with conclusive proof of their errors, the typical reaction is not a chastened pledge to shape up, but confused silence, followed by business as usual. No one likes to be told he is wrong. [br] Which of the following statements is TRUE of the human brain?
选项
A、In most cases, System 1 is working.
B、System 2 works to lead to mistakes.
C、System 2 is preferred by rational people.
D、System 2 is more complex than System 1.
答案
A
解析
细节题。由选项中的System 1和System 2定位至第四段。末句指出“System 2 kicks…to let the impulsive System 1 get its way.”,这说明更多的时候,是让受直觉影响的系统一来替我们作决定,[A]符合文意,故为答案。由第四段第三句可知,导致错误的是系统一,非系统二,排除[B];由第四句可知,文章并未说理性之人喜欢系统二,[C]为过度推断,排除;第四段末句只是说系统二更适用于处理复杂问题。该段分别介绍了系统一、系统二的特点,在第五段还具体分析了系统一的优点,并未比较两个系统哪个更复杂,[D]无依据,排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3262563.html
相关试题推荐
ThenovelGulliver’sTravelsiswrittenbyA、DanielDefoe.B、JonathanSwift.C、Fr
AccordingtoProfessorDanielePiomelli,humansdeveloped______.[br][original
AccordingtoProfessorDanielePiomelli,humansdeveloped______.[originaltext]
Get’emThinking!Usingthe"3Rs"ofMediaLiteracyToday,I’ll
Get’emThinking!Usingthe"3Rs"ofMediaLiteracyToday,I’ll
Get’emThinking!Usingthe"3Rs"ofMediaLiteracyToday,I’ll
Get’emThinking!Usingthe"3Rs"ofMediaLiteracyToday,I’ll
Get’emThinking!Usingthe"3Rs"ofMediaLiteracyToday,I’ll
[originaltext]A:Howdoyouandyourhousematesliketheco-up?I’mthinking
[originaltext]A:Howdoyouandyourhousematesliketheco-up?I’mthinking
随机试题
Plasticstodaycontributetoawide______ofindustries.A、fieldB、areaC、scopeD、
It’swellknownthatbiganimals,likepolarbears,aresensitivetoclimate
()自升塔式起重机都可改成附着式塔式起重机。A.上回转 B.下回转 C.中
由于未能及时控制火势,造成着火铲装车下风侧巷道和工作面的作业人员17人死亡、2人
1梅脱相当于每分钟每千克体重耗统量为()A.3ml B.3.5ml C.
中医之痢疾主要是指西医的A.溃疡性结肠炎 B.细菌性食物中毒 C.直肠癌
作业现场的生产条件和安全设施等应符合有关标准、规范的要求,()的劳动防护用品应
A有限责任公司实收资本为500万元,按照规定投资者的投资应于2020年
关于统计指数分类的说法,正确的有()。A.按所反映的内容不同,统计指数可分为数量
建设工程项目质量管理的PDCA循环中,质量计划阶段的主要任务是()。A.
最新回复
(
0
)