首页
登录
职称英语
American economists once spoofed university education as the only industry in
American economists once spoofed university education as the only industry in
游客
2023-12-08
68
管理
问题
American economists once spoofed university education as the only industry in which those who consume its product do not purchase it; those who produce it do not sell it, and those who finance it do not control it. That apt description, made in the 1970s, has been undermined since then by the emergence of the first for-profit universities in the United States. Controlled by entrepreneurs, these schools which number about 700 and counting sell a practical education to career-minded students and make a good buck doing it. They are now expanding abroad, creating the first multinational corporations in a sector long suspicious of balance sheets.
The companies are lured by a booming market in which capitalist competition is still scarce. The number of university students is expected to double in the next 25 years to 170 million worldwide. Demand greatly exceeds supply, because the 1990s saw massive global investment in primary and secondary schools, but not in universities. The number of children enrolled in primary or secondary schools rose by 18 percent around the world—more than twice the rate of increase in any previous decade. Now these kids are often graduating from high school to find no openings in national universities, which nevertheless don’t welcome for-profit competition. The Brazilian university teachers’ union warned that foreign corporations would turn higher education into "a diploma industry". Critics raised the specter of declining quality and a loss of Brazil’s "sovereign control" over education.
For-profit universities met with similar suspicion when they first opened in the United States. By the 1980s they were regularly accused of offering substandard education and had to fight for acceptance and respect. Lately, they have flourished by catering to older students who aren’t looking for keg parties, just a shortcut to a better career. For-profit colleges now attract 8 percent of four-year students in the United States, up from 3 percent a decade ago. By cutting out frills, including sports teams, student centers and summer vacation, these schools can operate with profit margins of 20 to 30 percent.
In some countries, the American companies operate as they do at home. Apollo found an easy fit in Brazil, where few universities have dorms, students often take off time between high school and college, and there’s no summer vacation—just two breaks in July and December. In other Latin countries, Sylvan has taken a different approach, buying traditional residential colleges like the Universidad del Valle de Mexico (UVM). It has boosted enrollment by adding and heavily advertising courses in career-track fields like business and engineering, and adding no-frills satellite campuses. Sensitive to the potential hostility against foreign buyers, Sylvan keeps original school names, adding its own brand, Sylvan International Universities, to publicity materials, and keeps tuition in line with local private schools.
Most of the schools that Sylvan has purchased were managed by for-profits to begin with, including the prestigious Les Roches Hotel Management School in Switzerland. But in general, Says Urdan, Sylvan’s targets "have not been run with world-class business practices. They’re not distressed, but there’s an opportunity for them to be better managed." When Sylvan paid $ 50 million for a controlling stake in UVM two years ago, the school had revenues of about $ 80 million and an enrollment of 32,000. The success of the for-profits is nothing to be afraid of, says World Bank education expert Jamil Salmi: "I don’t think they will replace traditional universities, but they can push some more traditional providers to be more innovative and more attentive to the needs of the labor market."
Some students at Sylvan schools in Latin America welcome the foreign invasion. At the Universidad de las Americas in Santiago, Daniels Villagrán says friends tease her for studying at "Yankeeland," but she figures Sylvan connections "will give me an edge when I go out to look for a job. "The emphasis on independent thought is what separates UVM from other institutions in Mexico. And, for better or worse, more American schools are on the way. [br] Recently, for-profits universities have been favored by older people because
选项
A、the teaching methods are appropriate to them.
B、they provide short-term training programs.
C、they can secure them a brighter future.
D、they can enable them to get higher salaries.
答案
C
解析
细节题。由题干中的older students定位至第三段。第三句指出:Lately,they have flourished by catering to older students who aren’t looking for keg parties,just a shortcut to a better career.C符合文意,故为答案。A和B与内容无关,排除。这里说的是a better career,并不—定意味着higher salaries,D不符合文意,排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3256133.html
相关试题推荐
Theword"freedom"formanyblackAmericansisinextricablylinkedwiththe
Americansfinditdifficulttoengageinanyactivityforpurepleasure.We
Americansfinditdifficulttoengageinanyactivityforpurepleasure.We
Americansfinditdifficulttoengageinanyactivityforpurepleasure.We
Ifyouwerestartingatopuniversitytoday,whatwoulditlooklike?Youw
Ifyouwerestartingatopuniversitytoday,whatwoulditlooklike?Youw
Ifyouwerestartingatopuniversitytoday,whatwoulditlooklike?Youw
Ifyouwerestartingatopuniversitytoday,whatwoulditlooklike?Youw
Ifyouwerestartingatopuniversitytoday,whatwoulditlooklike?Youw
Ifyouwerestartingatopuniversitytoday,whatwoulditlooklike?Youw
随机试题
Hebecamequiteoverbearinganddomineeringoncehehadbecomeaccustomedtothe
关于输水管设计的说法,错误的是哪几项?( )A.某水厂出水全部经高位水池向城市
影响工程成本的主要因素之一就是思想方面,以下描述不恰当的是()A.项目建
下列回声强度的描述,不正确的是A.皮下脂肪组织为低回声 B.肾皮质和肾柱为等回
根据《房屋建筑与装饰工程工程量计算规范》(GB50854-2013)规定,关于
可能性有现实可能性和抽象可能性之分,以下属于抽象可能性的是( )。A.大海捞针
在商品生产过程中,生产资料的价值是借助生产者的( ) A.具体劳动而增殖
作为应用文体,公文有广泛的实用性、()、全面的真实性、格式的规定性四个特点。
下列哪些做法不符合公证员职业道德的要求?()A.王公证员在除了做好公证工作外,还
根据个人所得税法律制度的规定,下列各项中,应缴纳个人所得税的是()。A.公务员
最新回复
(
0
)