首页
登录
职称英语
Where does morality come from? Throughout the history of Western civilizatio
Where does morality come from? Throughout the history of Western civilizatio
游客
2023-12-07
9
管理
问题
Where does morality come from? Throughout the history of Western civilization thinkers have usually answered either that it comes from God, or else through the application of reason.
But in The Bonobo and the Atheist, primatologist Frans de Waal argues that there’s another answer that fits the data better: morality comes from our evolutionary past as a social primate. Like our closest relatives, the apes, humans evolved in small, tightly knit, cooperative groups. As a result, again like the apes, we are exquisitely sensitive to one another’s moods, needs and intentions.
This well-developed empathy provided the trellis on which morality later flowered. De Waal, who is based at Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, has been making this case eloquently for many years and over several books, notably in Good Natured back in 1997, and in Primates and Philosophers, 12 years later.
In his new work, he bolsters the argument by drawing on a lot of new research, carefully footnoted for those who want to dig deeper. De Waal distinguishes two degrees of morality. The first he calls "one-on-one morality", which governs how an individual can expect to be treated, and the second "community concern", a larger, more abstract concept that extends to the harmony of the group as a whole.
Chimps and bonobos certainly have the former—they respect ownership, for example, and expect to be treated according to their place in the hierarchy. But de Waal presents several examples—such as a chimp stepping in to stop a fight between two others—that suggest that they also have a rudimentary form of the latter.
The book’s title, incidentally, draws on bonobos because they are more likely than chimps to behave morally, to have concern for each other, to value harmony and so on. This, imagines, de Waal, is something morally inclined atheists would want to emulate. If humans inherited morality from our ancestors, though, what are we to make of religion? Here de Waal moves into the territory he has not explored before. Clearly, religion must do something important, since every human culture has it. But instead of religion giving us morality, de Waal turns the tables. Morality, he argues, probably gave us religion as a way of reinforcing the pre-existing community concern.
If he’s right, then there may be no absolute code of right and wrong out there to be discovered. Instead, each individual’s evolved sense of empathy and concern for the group may help shape the group’s consensus on what kind of behaviour is appropriate. In short, says de Waal, morality may be something we all have to work out together. It’s a persuasive argument, and de Waal’s cautious and evidence-based approach is one that many New Scientist readers are sure to find congenial.
That careful approach is less evident in another book covering some of the same ground. In How Animals Grieve, anthropologist Barbara King sets out to explore the question of whether non-human animals grieve for their dead. It’s an intriguing question, but unfortunately King’s book is largely a succession of anecdotes: the cat who roams the house, crying, in search of its dead litter mate; the dog who waits daily at the train station for its dead master; a dolphin trying to keep her dead calf afloat for days.
Some of these stories make a persuasive case for some animals—especially apes, elephants and cetaceans— sometimes grieving. No surprises there: I suspect most readers would have conceded that ground right from the start.
But King makes little effort to dig any deeper by exploring, for example, the neural machinery and cognitive skills an animal needs in order to be capable of grief. After all, solitary species such as cats have less need for empathy- and its corollary, grief—than social animals, and small-brained creatures such as turtles may simply lack the brainpower or not form lasting pair bonds.
To his credit, de Waal takes full note of such distinctions; King, not so much. [br] The author writes the passage to
选项
A、analyze the origin of morality.
B、make comments on two books.
C、explore some animal behaviors.
D、present some intriguing findings.
答案
B
解析
主旨题。纵观全文,文章第一段提出问题:道德从何而来,第二到八段是Frans de waal关于道德的研究,第九到十一段是Barbara King对动物是否为同类的死亡表示哀痛的研究及著作,最后一段是对两个学者的著作的比较和评价,不难看出,作者的写作主要是对两本书做出比较和评论,因此选择[B]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3251972.html
相关试题推荐
A、awesternEuropeancountryB、withanareasmallerthanGermanyC、Itborderson
TheGrandCanyon,carvedbytheColoradoRiver,innorthwestern______isoneofn
ThefirstpresidentintheU.S.historywhoresignedbecauseofascandalis____
WASTstandsfor______.A、WesternAustraliaSupplyandTransportB、WebsterAptitu
TheUnitedKingdomislocatedinA、northernEurope.B、westernEurope.C、northwest
Melville’s______isanencyclopediaofeverything,history,philosophy,religion
TheoriesofHistoryⅠ.Howmuchweknowabouthistory?A.W
TheoriesofHistoryⅠ.Howmuchweknowabouthistory?A.W
TheoriesofHistoryⅠ.Howmuchweknowabouthistory?A.W
TheoriesofHistoryⅠ.Howmuchweknowabouthistory?A.W
随机试题
Whilethediseaseisinstateitisalmostimpossibletodetermineitsexistence
[originaltext]Ireallydon’tlikepopularmusic.HowaboutJohn?[/originaltext]
根据现代国民收入理论,假如其他条件不变,储蓄的变化将对国民收入产生什么影响?根据
机关、团体、企业、事业等单位以及村民委员会、居民委员会根据需要,建立志愿消防队等
脂肪的消化吸收主要在肝脏,在脂肪酶的作用下分解为脂肪酸和甘油。( )
宫颈表面突出多个青白色小囊泡,内含无色黏液,应诊断为A.宫颈糜烂 B.宫颈肥大
久立则A.伤骨B.伤血C.伤精D.伤筋E.伤肉
根据《市政公用设施抗灾设防管理规定》,下列选项中不正确的是( )。A.市政公用
早期硅肺的硅结节常位于 A.双肺上野B.双肺中叶C.胸膜D.肺门淋巴结
男性,24岁,农民,因畏寒发热起病,伴全身肌肉酸痛、头痛4天于8月10日入院。入
最新回复
(
0
)