首页
登录
职称英语
Where does morality come from? Throughout the history of Western civilizatio
Where does morality come from? Throughout the history of Western civilizatio
游客
2023-12-07
8
管理
问题
Where does morality come from? Throughout the history of Western civilization thinkers have usually answered either that it comes from God, or else through the application of reason.
But in The Bonobo and the Atheist, primatologist Frans de Waal argues that there’s another answer that fits the data better: morality comes from our evolutionary past as a social primate. Like our closest relatives, the apes, humans evolved in small, tightly knit, cooperative groups. As a result, again like the apes, we are exquisitely sensitive to one another’s moods, needs and intentions.
This well-developed empathy provided the trellis on which morality later flowered. De Waal, who is based at Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, has been making this case eloquently for many years and over several books, notably in Good Natured back in 1997, and in Primates and Philosophers, 12 years later.
In his new work, he bolsters the argument by drawing on a lot of new research, carefully footnoted for those who want to dig deeper. De Waal distinguishes two degrees of morality. The first he calls "one-on-one morality", which governs how an individual can expect to be treated, and the second "community concern", a larger, more abstract concept that extends to the harmony of the group as a whole.
Chimps and bonobos certainly have the former—they respect ownership, for example, and expect to be treated according to their place in the hierarchy. But de Waal presents several examples—such as a chimp stepping in to stop a fight between two others—that suggest that they also have a rudimentary form of the latter.
The book’s title, incidentally, draws on bonobos because they are more likely than chimps to behave morally, to have concern for each other, to value harmony and so on. This, imagines, de Waal, is something morally inclined atheists would want to emulate. If humans inherited morality from our ancestors, though, what are we to make of religion? Here de Waal moves into the territory he has not explored before. Clearly, religion must do something important, since every human culture has it. But instead of religion giving us morality, de Waal turns the tables. Morality, he argues, probably gave us religion as a way of reinforcing the pre-existing community concern.
If he’s right, then there may be no absolute code of right and wrong out there to be discovered. Instead, each individual’s evolved sense of empathy and concern for the group may help shape the group’s consensus on what kind of behaviour is appropriate. In short, says de Waal, morality may be something we all have to work out together. It’s a persuasive argument, and de Waal’s cautious and evidence-based approach is one that many New Scientist readers are sure to find congenial.
That careful approach is less evident in another book covering some of the same ground. In How Animals Grieve, anthropologist Barbara King sets out to explore the question of whether non-human animals grieve for their dead. It’s an intriguing question, but unfortunately King’s book is largely a succession of anecdotes: the cat who roams the house, crying, in search of its dead litter mate; the dog who waits daily at the train station for its dead master; a dolphin trying to keep her dead calf afloat for days.
Some of these stories make a persuasive case for some animals—especially apes, elephants and cetaceans— sometimes grieving. No surprises there: I suspect most readers would have conceded that ground right from the start.
But King makes little effort to dig any deeper by exploring, for example, the neural machinery and cognitive skills an animal needs in order to be capable of grief. After all, solitary species such as cats have less need for empathy- and its corollary, grief—than social animals, and small-brained creatures such as turtles may simply lack the brainpower or not form lasting pair bonds.
To his credit, de Waal takes full note of such distinctions; King, not so much. [br] About religion and morality, Frans de Waal believes that
选项
A、religion brings morality to us.
B、no code of right and wrong can be discovered out there.
C、people who have a religious belief behave appropriately.
D、individuals who care about a group can create morality.
答案
D
解析
细节题。第八段第二句提到,个体对群体所产生的共鸣与关注,有助于形成群体对恰当行为的共识,也就是说道德是我们共同努力的结果,故[D]为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3251970.html
相关试题推荐
TheUnitedKingdomislocatedinA、northernEurope.B、westernEurope.C、northwest
ThefirstpresidentintheU.S.historywhoresignedbecauseofascandalis____
WASTstandsfor______.A、WesternAustraliaSupplyandTransportB、WebsterAptitu
TheUnitedKingdomislocatedinA、northernEurope.B、westernEurope.C、northwest
TheoriesofHistoryⅠ.Howmuchweknowabouthistory?A.W
TheoriesofHistoryⅠ.Howmuchweknowabouthistory?A.W
TheoriesofHistoryⅠ.Howmuchweknowabouthistory?A.W
TheoriesofHistoryⅠ.Howmuchweknowabouthistory?A.W
TheMarshallPlanofferedeconomicaidto______.A、EuropeancountriesB、WesternE
SomeTheoriesofHistoryI.Theproblemsofunderstandi
随机试题
AroraHillsAsecur
Collegelifeoffersanarrayofactivitiesinwhichtoparticipate.Youshou
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteanessayentitledMyBestFri
我国校对工作的基本制度包括( )等A.坚持责任校对制度 B.坚持三审制度
既能解郁安神,又能活血消肿的药是A合欢皮 B柏子仁 C远志 D香附 E酸
膜材PVA05-88中“88”表示A、黏度 B、水解度 C、酸解度 D、聚
人员录用的原则不包括( )。A.因事择人原则 B.任人唯亲原则 C
认股权证的不利之处是:筹资会稀释股权;当股价大幅度上升时,导致认股权证成本过高
某种理想气体的总分子数为N,分子速率分布函数为f(v),则速率在v1~v2区间内
根据《房屋建筑与装饰工程工程量计算规范》(GB50854-2013),打桩项目
最新回复
(
0
)