首页
登录
职称英语
At a chess tournament in Tunisia in 1967, Bobby Fischer, then 24, was pitted
At a chess tournament in Tunisia in 1967, Bobby Fischer, then 24, was pitted
游客
2023-11-25
20
管理
问题
At a chess tournament in Tunisia in 1967, Bobby Fischer, then 24, was pitted against another American grand master, Samuel Reshevsky. At game time, Fischer was nowhere to be found, so Reshevsky sat down opposite Fischer’s empty chair, made his first move, punched the game clock and waited. And waited. With five minutes left, Fischer suddenly strode onstage and, with a series of blindingly quick moves, hammered Reshevsky into defeat. Two days later, Fischer quit the tournament and abandoned competitive chess for two years. Which raises the question, Why is the gift of genius so often given to people too stupid to know what to do with it?
In "Bobby Fischer Goes to War" (Ecco; 342 pages), David Edmonds and John Ei-dinow tell the story of Fischer’s most famous match, the 1972 world championship in Reykjavik. Fischer faced Soviet grand master Boris Spassky in a chess game that was not only an epic staring match between two intellectual gladiators but also the focus of all kinds of weird, free-floating cold war cultural-political energy. It was the Rumble in the Jungle and the Cuban missile crisis all rolled into one.
The drama was hopelessly miscast. Fischer, the champion of the American way, was an antisocial, anti-Semitic ego-maniac who complained about the lighting, the auditorium, the prize money, even the marble the chessboard was made of. Spassky, the cog in the Soviet machine, was a genial, sensitive fellow who liked a drink once in a while. He was Ali to Fischer’s Foreman. Of course, Fischer ate him alive. "Bobby Fischer Goes to War" tells the story in fine, brisk style, interpreting the red-hot chess-fu action—the Ruy Lopez opening! The Nimzo-Indian defense!—for us nongeniuses and conveying the richness of the world beyond the chessboard through details plucked from FBI and KGB records. We see, for example, Soviet experts whisking Spassky’s orange juice back to Moscow to test for suspicious capitalist contaminants.
It seems to be in the nature of genius to zero in on its purpose. In the 1790s a young French boy named Jean-Francois Champollion, the son of a bookseller, became obsessed with ancient languages—not only Latin and Greek hut also Hebrew, Arabic,
Persian and Chaldean. According to "The Linguist and the Emperor" (Ballantine; 271 pages), by Daniel Meyerson, Champollion was a dreamy, solitary kid who mouthed oft in class, but as a schoolboy, he assembled a 2,000-page dictionary of Coptic, an ancient Egyptian language. Luckily for him, French soldiers in Egypt soon discovered the Ro-setta stone, a chunk of gray and pink rock with the same text written on it in both Greek and Egyptian hieroglyphics, which no one had yet deciphered. Unlocking hieroglyphics was Champollion’s great work, and Meyerson tells the story as a passionate linguistic love affair. After finally solving the mystery, Champollion collapsed in a coma for eight days.
Champollion and Fischer were lucky: they were heroes in their time. Deprived of the spotlight, genius can grow up twisted and strange. David Hahn was the child of divorced, clueless parents living in a David Lynch—perfect Michigan suburb in the mid-1990s. A loner and a compulsive tinkerer, Hahn somehow got it into his head in high school to build a nuclear reactor in his mom’s potting shed, and damn if he didn’t come close. In "The Radioactive Boy Scout" (Random House; 209 pages), Ken Silverstein describes how Hahn extracted radioactive elements from household objects—ameri-cium from smoke detectors, thorium from Coleman lanterns, deadly radium from the glow-in-the-dark paint used on the hands of vintage clocks. For sheer improvisational ingenuity, Hahn makes MacGyver look like Jessica Simpson. When public-health officials finally caught on to what Hahn was up to, the potting shed was so hot that it had to be classified as a Superfund site.
Stories about geniuses rarely end well. Hahn wound up in the Navy, assigned to the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier the U.S. Enterprise, but his officers wouldn’t even let him tour the engine room. Champollion died at 40. Fischer never defended his world title. He declined into irascibility and then obscurity. What happened to him? A chess master once said, "Chess is not something that drives people mad. Chess is something that keeps mad people sane." Which is to say that genius may lie not only in having a gift but in lacking something crucial as well. Reading these books, one feels grateful for being just a little stupid. [br] The book "Bobby Fischer Goes to War" describes the following except________.
选项
A、The Vietnam War Fischer went to
B、Fischer’s most famous match
C、Stories beyond the match
D、Fischer’s character
答案
A
解析
由二、三段不难看出,Bobby Fischer Goes to War一书讲述了Fischer最有名的那场比赛(B),讲述了赛场外的故事(C),也描述了Fischer的性格(D),虽然提到了越战(the Rumble in the Jungle),但Fischer并没有参加,故选项A与原文不符,应为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3216888.html
相关试题推荐
AtachesstournamentinTunisiain1967,BobbyFischer,then24,waspitted
AtachesstournamentinTunisiain1967,BobbyFischer,then24,waspitted
AtachesstournamentinTunisiain1967,BobbyFischer,then24,waspitted
AtachesstournamentinTunisiain1967,BobbyFischer,then24,waspitted
AtachesstournamentinTunisiain1967,BobbyFischer,then24,waspitted
AtachesstournamentinTunisiain1967,BobbyFischer,then24,waspitted
AtachesstournamentinTunisiain1967,BobbyFischer,then24,waspitted
AtachesstournamentinTunisiain1967,BobbyFischer,then24,waspitted
WhowontheFrenchOpenTennisTournamentthisyear?[br][originaltext]ABe
WhowontheFrenchOpenTennisTournamentthisyear?[originaltext]ABelgian
随机试题
关于大学的功能,人们的看法各不相同。有人觉得大学是一个给学生提供知识的平台,学生们获得的应该是更多的知识。而随着越来越多的大学毕业生面临严峻的就业形势,
下列表述中,正确的有()。A.票据的出票日期必须使用中文大写填写 B.票据的大
URL为http://www.tsinghua.edu.cn/index.ht
路基防护与加固工程可以分为( )、沿河路基防护和支挡构造物。A.坡面防护 B
对从事传染病预防、医疗、科研的人员以及现场处理疫情的人员,为了保障其健康,他们所
( )是基金估值的第一责任主体。A.基金托管人 B.基金投资人 C.基金管
A.泽泻B.紫菀C.三棱D.香附E.苍术根茎簇生多数细根,编成辫状,气微香,味甜
银行业从业人员应当具备岗位所需的专业知识、资格与能力属于()。 A.诚实信用
自我概念的功能包括()。A.适应环境 B.决定期待 C.解释经验 D.
新时代我国社会主要矛盾是()。A.人民日益增长的物质文化需要同落后的社会生产之间
最新回复
(
0
)