2. 职称英语
  3. Comedy’s legendary Monty Python members—you know, "I’m a lumberjack(伐木工)and

Comedy’s legendary Monty Python members—you know, "I’m a lumberjack(伐木工)and

游客2023-11-03  91
问题     Comedy’s legendary Monty Python members—you know, "I’m a lumberjack(伐木工)and I’m okay," the Killer Rabbit, the Dead Parrot—were tired of seeing their legendary sketches pirated and fuzzily posted on YouTube, free to whoever wanted a quick laugh. So they posted their own, higher-quality versions on YouTube—also free—but let fans know that complete DVD versions were available for purchase. Sales rose 23,000 percent. "Free worked, and worked brilliantly... People are making lots of money charging nothing. Not nothing for everything, but nothing for enough that we have essentially created a country-sized economy around the price of $0.00. " Anderson, 48, the editor of Wired magazine, discussed the allure of zero with Jesse Kornbluth.
    In the 20th century, "free" meant giving away one thing to create demand for another. Get a free cell phone, for example, by buying a monthly plan. What is "free" now?
    Yes, 20th-century "free" was about real objects made of atoms. Real costs were involved, so the consumer paid one way or another. In the 21st century, "free" is digital bit with marginal costs. For all practical purposes, they really are free.
    In the digital economy, someone pays, but increasingly it’s not you. Google and Wikipedia, for example, don’t show up on your credit card. So how do you pay? Not with money, but with your time and attention. Some resources, of course, are scarce and getting scarcer; you pay for those. Digital goods and services, because they can be reproduced and distributed at almost no cost, are abundant.
    Once you’ve given content away on the Web, can you get people to pay? Absolutely. Use "free" to get an audience, then segment your user base so you have a free version and a premium one. The Wall Street Journal created a clever hybrid—some free articles, some available only to paid subscribers.
    I get the sense that—when it comes to news, anyway—we’ll soon have two classes of Internet users: 1)people who have money and will pay for quality reporting and analysis, and 2)people who are less well-off or care less about quality and will accept any information that’s free. So the elite will be better informed, and others may get trashier media.
    I’m simply observing what happens in economics when marginal costs fall. In economic terms, "free" is the law of gravity. I don’t tell the apple to fall; it just falls. I don’t tell water to flow downhill; it just does. In that way, it’s simple; As costs approach zero, "free" prevails. [br] The author seems to be mainly concerned with______.
选项 A、the development of the websites
B、the division of people according to the required information
C、the trend that "free" is the future of a radical price
D、how to get the free information
答案 C
解析 主旨题。此题考查对全文的理解。通篇传达的是作者对“免费”概念的关注，[C]符合题干要求，故为正确答案。[A]“互联网的发展”是文章的背景，故排除；[B]“按照信息需求划分使用者”是“免费”概念下的做法，故排除；[D]“如何获取免费信息”并不是文章的焦点，故排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3155331.html
相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)