[A]abolish[B]accelerate[C]ambiguity[D]bring[E]dispense[F]evidence[G]expenditure

游客2023-11-01 74

问题 [A]abolish[B]accelerate[C]ambiguity[D]bring[E]dispense
[F]evidence[G]expenditure[H]inquiry[I]irrational[J]lead
[K]outpace[L]shift[M]simply[N]striking[O]unanimously
For the past four decades that basic tension between artificial intelligence and intelligence augmentation(增加)—A.I. versus I. A.—has been at the heart of progress in computing science as the field has produced a series of ever more powerful technologies that are transforming the world.
Now, as the pace of technological change continues to【C1】______, it has become increasingly possible to design computing systems that enhance the human experience, or now—in a growing number of cases—completely【C2】______with it.
Watson is an effort by IBM researchers to advance a set of techniques used to process human language. It provides【C3】______evidence that computing systems will no longer be limited to responding to simple commands. Machines will increasingly be able to pick out jargon(行话)and even riddles. In attacking the problem of the【C4】______of human language, computer science is now closing in on what researchers refer to as the "Paris Hilton problem"—the ability, for example, to determine whether an【C5】______ is being made by someone who is trying to reserve a hotel in France, or【C6】______to pass time surfing the Internet.
Traditionally, economists have argued that while new forms of automation may displace jobs in the short run, over longer periods of time economic growth and job creation have continued to 【C7】______any job-killing technologies. For example, over the past century and a half the 【C8】______from being a largely agrarian(农业的)society to one in which less than 1 percent of the United States labor force is in agriculture is frequently cited as【C9】______of the economy’s ability to reinvent itself.
That, however, was before machines began to "understand" human language. Rapid progress in natural language processing is beginning to【C10】______to a new wave of automation that promises to transform areas of the economy that have until now been untouched by technological change. [br] 【C4】

选项

答案 C

解析名词辨析题。空格前为定冠词the，后为介词短语of human language，因此空格处应填名词。空格后面部分提到Paris Hilton problem的例子，指出Paris Hilton既可指法国巴黎的希尔顿酒店，也可指美国社交名媛Paris Hilton，这个例子说明了语言的模糊性，故本题选ambiguity“模棱两可，不明确”。

转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3148465.html

相关试题推荐

随机试题

最新回复(0)

[A]abolish[B]accelerate[C]ambiguity[D]bring[E]dispense[F]evidence[G]expenditure