首页
登录
职称英语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against
游客
2023-10-31
52
管理
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned, that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness(无情)toward individuals. [br] What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the US.
B、History of the US railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
本文主要介绍的是美国法院在铁路公司伤害案中的裁决,因此D是最佳答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3144989.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]M:Hey,Keiko,youlivedintheStatesforfiveyears,right?W:
[originaltext]M:Hey,Keiko,youlivedintheStatesforfiveyears,right?W:
[originaltext]W:Hey,Greg,growingupintheStates,didyouhaveanypart-tim
[originaltext]W:Hey,Greg,growingupintheStates,didyouhaveanypart-tim
[originaltext]W:Hey,Greg,growingupintheStates,didyouhaveanypart-tim
LanguagesinAmericaTheUnitedStatesis【T1】______anEnglishspeaking
LanguagesinAmericaTheUnitedStatesis【T1】______anEnglishspeaking
LanguagesinAmericaTheUnitedStatesis【T1】______anEnglishspeaking
LanguagesinAmericaTheUnitedStatesis【T1】______anEnglishspeaking
LanguagesinAmericaTheUnitedStatesis【T1】______anEnglishspeaking
随机试题
Architectsarehopelesswhenitcomestodecidingwhetherthepublicwillvi
Teenageboys,regardlessofrace,aremorelikelytodiefromgunshotwounds
Thedesiretouselanguageasasignofnationalidentityisaverynatural
国家制图标准规定,各种图线的粗细相同。()
伊塔费提出的四阶段法中的四阶段是指运输发展的“点”、“线”、“网”阶段和()
A.启膈散 B.通幽汤 C.血府逐瘀汤 D.沙参麦冬汤 E.补气运脾汤或
共用题干 假设资本资产定价模型成立,相关证券的风险与收益信息如表3-6所示。(
(2018年真题)某男,60岁。患慢性支气管炎近10年。近日因感风寒导致病情加重
(2013年)高压喷射灌浆凝结体形状如下图所示,其喷射形式为()。 A.旋
哪种药物试验治疗可用来鉴别肝外阻塞性黄疸与非梗阻性胆汁淤积性黄疸A.螺内酯(安体
最新回复
(
0
)