首页
登录
职称英语
If asked, "What are health decisions?", most of us would answer in terms of
If asked, "What are health decisions?", most of us would answer in terms of
游客
2023-10-14
50
管理
问题
If asked, "What are health decisions?", most of us would answer in terms of hospitals, doctors and pills. Yet we are all making a whole range of decisions about our health which go beyond this limited area; for example, whether or not to smoke, exercise, drive a motorbike, or drink alcohol really. The ways we reach decisions and form attitudes about our health are only just beginning to be understood.
The main paradox is why people consistently do things which are known to be very hazardous. Two good examples of this are smoking and not wearing seat belts. Both these examples underline elements of how people reach decisions about their health. Understanding this process is crucial. We can then more effectively change public attitudes to hazardous, voluntary activities like smoking.
Smokers run double the risk of contracting heart disease, several times the risk of suffering from chronic bronchitis and at least 25 times the risk of lung cancer, as compared to non-smokers. Despite extensive press campaigns ( especially in the past 20 years) , which have regularly told smokers and car drivers the grave risks they are running, the number of smokers and seat belt wearers has remained much the same. Although the number of deaths from road accidents and smoking are well publicised, they have aroused little public interest.
If we give smokers the real figures, will it alter their views on the dangers of smoking? Unfortunately not. Many of the "real figures" are in the form of probabilistic estimates, and evidence shows that people are very bad at processing and understanding this kind of information.
The kind of information that tends to be relied on both by the smoker and seat belt non-wearer is anecdotal, based on personal experiences. All smokers seem to have an Uncle Bill or an Auntie Mabel who has been smoking cigarettes since they were twelve, lived to 90, and died because they fell down the stairs. And if they don’t have such an aunt or uncle, they are certain to have heard of someone who has. Similarly, many motorists seem to have heard of people who would have been killed if they had been wearing seat belts.
Reliance on this kind of evidence and not being able to cope with "probabilistic" data form the two main foundation stones of people’s assessment of risk. A third is reliance on press-publicised dangers and causes of death. American psychologists have shown that people overestimate the frequency (and therefore the danger) of the dramatic causes of death (like aeroplane crashes)and underestimate the undramatic, unpublicised killers (like smoking) which actually take a greater toll of life.
What is needed is some way of changing people’s evaluations of and attitudes to the risks of certain activities like smoking. What can be done? The "national" approach of giving people the "facts and figures" seems ineffective. But the evidence shows that when people are frightened, they are more likely to change their estimates of the dangers involved in smoking or not wearing seat belts. Press and television can do this very cost-effectively. Programmes like Dying for a Fag (a Thames TV programme) vividly showed the health hazards of smoking and may have increased the chances of people stopping smoking permanently.
So a mass-media approach may work. But it needs to be carefully controlled. Overall, the new awareness of the problem of health decisions and behaviour is at least a more hopeful sign for the future.
For answers 51-55, mark
Y (for YES) if the statement agrees with the information given in the passage;
N (for NO) if the statement contradicts the information given in the passage;
NG (for NOT GIVEN) if the information is not given in the passage. [br] For answers 56-60, complete the sentences with the information given in the passage in a maximum of 4 words.
选项
答案
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3096886.html
相关试题推荐
AnswerthequestionbelowWhattreeisalwaysverysad?Weepingwillow:Weepmean
Healthexpertspointoutthatabudget-crunchedpublicschoollosesalotwheni
Whyisitsaidthattheeconomyishealthywith20millionunemployed?[br][or
Whyisitsaidthattheeconomyishealthywith20millionunemployed?[br][or
Whyisitsaidthattheeconomyishealthywith20millionunemployed?[original
Guesstheanswertotheriddle.Itdoesn’thaveamouth,butitcanwhistle
It______Samwhocalledanddidn’tleaveamessageontheansweringmachine.Hes
TheheadquartersofTheWorldHealthOrganization(WHO)andtheWorldTradeOrga
Healthexpertspointoutthatabudget-crunchedpublicschoollosesalotwheni
Writeanessayofnolessthan160wordsontheanswersheetinwhichyoudiscus
随机试题
[audioFiles]2018m3x/audio_ezfj_ezflisteningd_201803_055[/audioFiles]TheSpa
A
我国建立健全义务教育均衡发展保障机制,推进义务教育学校标准化建设,均衡配置教师、
请回答昆仑的主治,叙述并演示昆仑、关元的定位及关元的操作。(10分)
下列关于地图出版管理,说法错误的是()A:出版绘有国界线的地图,应当依照有关规定
将临终患者的心理过程分为五个阶段的是A:南丁格尔 B:库勒-罗斯 C:桑德斯
城市地下空间的开发利用应贯彻统一规划、综合开发、()、依法管理的原则。A.
(2010年真题)代为清偿票据债务的保证人和背书人不是行使票据追索权的当事人。(
斜坡堤抛填堤心石中,一次抛填量大,适用于粗抛的船是()。A.民船 B.方驳
病历摘要:男性,60岁,突然昏迷2小时来诊。 患者2小时前饮酒时,突然语言不清
最新回复
(
0
)