首页
登录
职称英语
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why ar
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why ar
游客
2023-10-10
63
管理
问题
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why are they doing it, and will it work? The Danish government’s now infamous, since "fat tax" has caused an international uproar. It’s praised by public health advocates on the one hand and dismissed on the other as nanny-state social engineering gone violent.
I see it as one country’s attempt to stave off rising obesity(肥胖症)rates, when other options seem less feasible. But the policies appear confusing. Why Denmark of all places? Why particular foods? Will such taxes really change eating behaviour? And aren’t there better ways to halt or reverse rising rates of diet-related chronic(慢性的)disease?
Before getting to these questions, let’s look at what Denmark has done. In 2009, its government announced a major tax overhaul aimed at softening the shock of the global economic crisis, promoting renewable energy, protecting the environment, discouraging climate change, and improving health—all while maintaining revenues, of course. The tax reforms make it more expensive to produce products likely to harm the environment and to consume products potentially harmful to health, specifically tobacco, ice cream, chocolate, candy, sugar-sweetened soft drinks, and foods containing lots of fats.
Taxes pay for this through policies that maintain a relatively narrow gap between the incomes of rich and poor. Because its level of income disparity(差异)is relatively low, the effects of health taxes are less hard on the poor that in many other countries. But the Danes want their health to be better. Life expectancy in Denmark is 79 years, at least two years below that in Japan or Iceland. The stated goal of the tax policies is to increase life expectancy as well as to reduce the burden and cost of illness from diet-related diseases. [br] What is the goal of the tax policies in Denmark?
选项
A、To realize the effects of health taxes.
B、To reduce the health taxes of Denmark.
C、To increase life expectancy and reduce the burden of illness.
D、To reduce the consumption of unhealthy products.
答案
C
解析
由题干中的the goal of the taxpolicies定位到第四段最后一句。该句指出丹麦国家税务政策的目标就是延长人们的平均寿命,并减少人们治疗与饮食相关的疾病的负担和费用,所以C)符合文意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3087743.html
相关试题推荐
健康是幸福的关键。只有健康的人才享受生活的乐趣。Healthisthekeytohappiness.Onlyahealthyman/perso
EnviablyhealthyDenmarkisleadingthewayintaxingunhealthyfood.Whyar
EnviablyhealthyDenmarkisleadingthewayintaxingunhealthyfood.Whyar
EnviablyhealthyDenmarkisleadingthewayintaxingunhealthyfood.Whyar
EnviablyhealthyDenmarkisleadingthewayintaxingunhealthyfood.Whyar
EnviablyhealthyDenmarkisleadingthewayintaxingunhealthyfood.Whyar
EnviablyhealthyDenmarkisleadingthewayintaxingunhealthyfood.Whyar
EnviablyhealthyDenmarkisleadingthewayintaxingunhealthyfood.Whyare
EnviablyhealthyDenmarkisleadingthewayintaxingunhealthyfood.Whyare
EnviablyhealthyDenmarkisleadingthewayintaxingunhealthyfood.Whyare
随机试题
______hisphonenumber,Iwouldhavemadeacalltohim.A、IfIknewB、IfIshoul
Ifapriceoramount______itkeepschangingandbecominghigherandlowerA、tum
[originaltext]Scientistssaysharkshavelivedintheworld’soceansformi
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteashortessayonthefoll
对于一维非稳态导热的有限差分方程,如果对时间域采用显式格式进行计算,则对于内部节
送站服务是地方导游服务的最后一环,包括()等项内容。A.送站前服务 B.结账服
体外冲击波碎石适用于治疗( )。A.肾结石 B.输尿管上段结石 C.输尿管
A.滴眼剂 B.合剂 C.酒剂 D.浸膏剂 E.糖浆剂无菌浸出制剂是
瑞替普酶溶栓作用迅速、完全、持久,与二代溶栓酶相比,优势为A.全身纤溶活性大于链
在企业安全文化建设过程中,职工应充分理解和接受企业的安全理念,并结合岗位任务践行
最新回复
(
0
)