首页
登录
职称英语
A nine year old schoolgirl single handedly cooks up a science fair experimen
A nine year old schoolgirl single handedly cooks up a science fair experimen
游客
2023-09-12
60
管理
问题
A nine year old schoolgirl single handedly cooks up a science fair experiment that ends up debunking (揭穿真相) a wildly practiced medical treatment. Emily Rosa’s target was a practice known as therapeutic (治疗的) touch (TT for short ), whose advocates manipulate patients’ "energy field" to make them feel better and even, say some, to cure them of various ills. Yet Emily’s test shows that these energy fields can’t be detected, even by trained TT practitioners (行医者). Obviously mindful of the publicity value of the situation, Journal editor Georgy Lundberg appeared on TV to declare, "Age doesn’t matter. It’s good science that matters, and this is good science."
Emily’s mother Linda Rosa, a registered nurse, has been campaigning against TT for nearly decade. Linda first thought about TT in the late 1980s, when she learned it was on the approved list for continuing nursing education in Colorado. Its 100,000 trained practitioners (48,000 in the U. S. ) don’t touch their patients. Instead, they waved their hands a few inches from the patient’s body, pushing energy fields around until they are in "balance". TT advocates say these manipulations can help heal wounds, relieve pain and reduce fever. The claims are taken seriously enough that TT therapists are frequently hired by leading hospitals, at up to $ 70 an hour, to smooth patients’ energy, sometimes during surgery.
Yet Rosa could not find any evidence that it works. To provide such proof, TT therapists would have to sit down for independent testing — something they haven’t been eager to do, even though James Randi has offered more than $1 million to anyone who can demonstrate the existence of a human energy field. (He’s had one taker so far. She failed.) A skeptic might conclude that TT practitioners are afraid to lay their beliefs on the line. But who could turn down an innocent four grader? Says Emily: "I think they didn’t take me very seriously because I’m a kid."
The experiment was straightforward: 21 TT therapists stuck their hands, palms up, through a screen. Emily held her own hand over one of theirs — left or right — and the practitioners had to say which hand it was. When the results were recorded, they’d done no better than they would have by simply guessing. If there was an energy field, they couldn’t feel it. [br] Very few TT practitioners responded to the $1 million offer because ______.
选项
A、they didn’t take the offer seriously
B、they didn’t want to risk their career
C、they were unwilling to reveal their secret
D、they thought it was not in line with their practice
答案
C
解析
文意理解题。A:他们并没有以严肃的态度对待这奖励金;B:他们不愿意冒失去职业的危险;C;他们不愿意泄霹秘密:D;他们认为那与他们的做法相悖。100万美元在文中最后一段提到,为什么很少有人跃跃欲试呢,从最后一段谈到的内容可以推断出,他们根本就没有什么实际的可以治疗疾病的科学依据,所以也拿不出真实的证据演示来,所以,C正确。实际上,也可根据我们的常识得知,原因是,这些TT行医者不愿意泄露他们的秘密。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3007937.html
相关试题推荐
Themoststrikingsinglefactaboutchimpanzeesisflexibilityof
Themoststrikingsinglefactaboutchimpanzeesisflexibilityof
Themoststrikingsinglefactaboutchimpanzeesisflexibilityof
Themoststrikingsinglefactaboutchimpanzeesisflexibilityof
Themoststrikingsinglefactaboutchimpanzeesisflexibilityof
[originaltext]HenrySmithtaughtscienceattheCitySchool.Oncehewentt
[originaltext]HenrySmithtaughtscienceattheCitySchool.Oncehewentt
[originaltext]ThroughaseriesofexperimentsanAmericanscientisthasobt
Anineyearoldschoolgirlsinglehandedlycooksupasciencefairexperimen
Anineyearoldschoolgirlsinglehandedlycooksupasciencefairexperimen
随机试题
Workerswithskillsinscience,technology,engineering,andmathematics(STE
Inthepast,therailroadprovidedthefastestandmostefficientkindoftransp
Novell网络支持的传输协议有()。A.Novell本身的SPX/IPX协议
卡特公司收到了一份一次性订单,订购1,000件kB-96部件。假设卡特公司有过剩
某期货公司在客户出现保证金不足且呈持续状态的情况下,允许其继续进行期货交易,此后
有4台相同的水泵位于同一平面,布局如图所示,若将其等效为一个点声源。下列说法中,
(2018年真题)与其他工程总承包方式相比较,交钥匙总承包的优越性有( )。A
既想参赛锻炼自己,又怕成绩不好被人讥笑,此时的动机冲突是A.双避冲突 B.趋避
会计的监督职能是会计人员在进行会计核算的同时,对特定会计主体经济活动的真实性、合
施工机械使用费主要由台班数量和台班单价两方面决定,为有效控制施工机械使用费的支出
最新回复
(
0
)