首页
登录
职称英语
About the time that schools and others quite reasonably became interested in
About the time that schools and others quite reasonably became interested in
游客
2023-08-18
65
管理
问题
About the time that schools and others quite reasonably became interested in seeing to it that all children, whatever their background, were fairly treated, intelligence testing became unpopular.
Some thought it was unfair to minority children. Through the past few decades such testing has gone out of fashion and many communities have indeed forbidden it.
However, paradoxically, just recently a group of black parents filed lawsuit(诉讼)in California claiming that the state’s ban on IQ testing discriminates against their children by denying them the opportunity to take the test(They believed, correctly, that IQ tests are a valid method of evaluating children for special education classes.)The judge, therefore, reversed, at least partially, his original decision.
And so the argument goes on and on. Does it benefit or harm children from minority groups to have their intelligence tested? We have always been on the side of permitting, even facilitating, such testing. If a child of any color or group is doing poorly in school it seems to us very important to know whether it is because he or she is of low intelligence, or whether some other factor is the cause.
What school and family can do to improve poor performance is influenced by its cause. It is not discriminative to evaluate either a child’s physical condition or his intellectual level.
Unfortunately, intellectual level seems to be a sensitive subject, and what the law allows us to do varies from time to time. The same fluctuation back and forth occurs in areas other than intelligence. Thirty years or so ago, for instance, white families were encouraged to adopt black children. It was considered discriminative not to do so.
And then the style changed and this cross-racial adopting became generally unpopular, and social agencies felt that black children should go to black families only. It is hard to say what are the best procedures. But surely good will on the part of all of us is needed.
As to intelligence, in our opinion, the more we know about any child’s intellectual level, the better for the child in question. [br] The recent legal action taken by some black parents in California aimed to_____.
选项
A、draw public attention to IQ testing
B、put an end to special education
C、remove the state’s ban on intelligence tests
D、have their children enter white schools
答案
C
解析
根据文章第3段第2句“最近,一群黑人父母提出诉讼,声称该州禁止智商测验剥夺了他们的孩子接受这种测验的机会,是对孩子的歧视”,由此可判断黑人父母要求取消对智力测试的禁令。故此,应该选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/2937104.html
相关试题推荐
FilmSchoolsA)Filmschoolsandfilmdirectingschoo
FilmSchoolsA)Filmschoolsandfilmdirectingschoo
FilmSchoolsA)Filmschoolsandfilmdirectingschoo
FilmSchoolsA)Filmschoolsandfilmdirectingschoo
FilmSchoolsA)Filmschoolsandfilmdirectingschoo
[originaltext]YoucouldsaythatJosephCornellbecameanartistbecauseof
[originaltext]YoucouldsaythatJosephCornellbecameanartistbecauseof
[originaltext]LastsummerIwentthroughatrainingprogramandbecameali
[originaltext]LastsummerIwentthroughatrainingprogramandbecameali
[originaltext]W:Interestedinthisbook?Thisisourbestsellerthisweek.M:B
随机试题
Whathappenedtotheshopinonemonth?[br][originaltext]Mr.Blueisari
Asmallgroupofsalt-and-pepperhairedwomenwholiveoutsideJackson,Miss
Findingagoodwork-at-homejobisnoteasy.Althoughyouseealltheonline
2010年全国非商品住宅投资完成额约占房地产投资完成额的()。 A.41
A.毛细血管前阻力增加和毛细血管后阻力增加 B.微动脉、微静脉和毛细血管前括约
根据交通部《公路工程施工分包管理办法》规定,下列专业分包的说法中错误的有()。A
对建设项目法人责任制的表述中,有误的是()。A:建设项目法人的责任涵盖建设项目
导致气道峰值压增高的原因不包括A.分泌物过多 B.管道阻塞 C.气管插管进入
下列关于生态恢复的表述,哪项是错误的?()(2013年真题)A.生态恢复不
下列说法中,正确的是( )。A.大赦既赦其刑,又赦其罪B.特赦只赦其刑
最新回复
(
0
)