首页
登录
职称英语
Why has crime in the U.S. declined so dramatically since the 1990s? Econom
Why has crime in the U.S. declined so dramatically since the 1990s? Econom
游客
2023-08-15
99
管理
问题
Why has crime in the U.S. declined so dramatically since the 1990s?
Economists and sociologists have offered a bounty of reasons, including more police, more security technology, more economic growth, more immigration, more imprisonment, and so on.
The "real" answer is almost certainly a combination of these factors, rather than one of them to the exclusion of the rest. But a new paper adds a surprising variable to the mix. What if the decline of crime in America started with the decline of cash?
Cash is critical to the health of an underground economy, because it’ s anonymous, nearly untraceable, and easily stolen. This makes it the lifeblood of the black market.
But Americans are rapidly abandoning cash thanks to credit cards, debit cards, and mobile payments. Half a century ago, cash was used in 80 percent of U.S. payments. Now that figure is about 50 percent, according to researchers.
In the 1980s, the federal government switched from paper money to electronic benefit transfers. They didn’t switch all at once. They switched one county at a time within states. This created a kind of randomly controlled environment for the researchers, who studied Missouri’ s counties to establish whether the areas that switched from welfare cash to electronic transfers saw a concurrent decline in crime.
The results were striking: The shift away from cash was associated with "a significant decrease in the overall crime rate and the specific offenses of burglary and assault in Missouri and a decline in arrests." In other words, the counties saw a decline in specific crimes when they switched away from cash welfare.
Perhaps most interestingly, they found that the switch to electronic transfers reduced robbery but not rape, suggesting that the move away from cash only had an impact on crime related to getting and spending cash.
The move toward cashlessness in the U.S. continues quickly. Google now lets you attach mon ey to emails to send to friends, which means that for some shoppers, pulling out your credit card could become as rare as finding exact change in your coin purse. It might seem absurd to imagine Visa, Square, and Google Wallet as crime-fighting technologies. But with a better understanding of how cash’ s availability affects crime, perhaps the government should consider killing more than just the penny. [br] Which of the following would be the most appropriate title for this text?
选项
A、Why has Crime in America Declined since the 1990s
B、How the Decline of Cash Makes America a Safer Country
C、The Impacts of the Decline of Cash in America
D、The Relations between Cash and Crime
答案
B
解析
主旨题。整篇文章围绕两个关键词cash和crime展开论述。A项“20世纪90年代以来美国的犯罪情况为何下降”,没有提到现金的作用。C项“减少现金使用对美国的影响”,没有提到对犯罪的影响。D项“现金与犯罪的关系”过于宽泛,没有紧扣减少现金使用可减少犯罪这个中心。因此只有B项“减少现金使用如何使美国变得更安全”为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/2926847.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]Inthe18thcenturyFrencheconomistsprotestedtheexcessive
[originaltext]Inthe18thcenturyFrencheconomistsprotestedtheexcessive
[originaltext]TheeconomiccrisisinEuropeandNorthAmericaledtomoreth
[originaltext]TheeconomiccrisisinEuropeandNorthAmericaledtomoreth
[originaltext]TheeconomiccrisisinEuropeandNorthAmericaledtomoreth
WhyhascrimeintheU.S.declinedsodramaticallysincethe1990s?Econom
TheAmazon-WalmartShowdownThatExplainstheModernEconomy[A]WithA
TheAmazon-WalmartShowdownThatExplainstheModernEconomy[A]WithA
TheAmazon-WalmartShowdownThatExplainstheModernEconomy[A]WithA
TheAmazon-WalmartShowdownThatExplainstheModernEconomy[A]WithA
随机试题
HospitalityAnAmericanfriendhas【T1】______youtovisithisfamily.Bu
A公司以1000000美元的价格收购了B公司。在收购日,B公司净资产的账面价值是
如图所示的结构中,B支座发生支座移动,D点水平位移(向右为正)为( )。
下列关于代理的说法中,错误的是()。A.第三人知道行为人没有代理权、超越代理权
人的需要和目的被消融到追求经济增长的技术目标中,人反而成了实现目标的工具。这体现
等电位作业人员对接地体的距离应不小于:220kV()m,330kV(
在汇率制度中,管理浮动的本质特征是()。A、各国维持本币对美元的法定平价
投资项目决策分析与评价的基本要求包括贯彻落实科学发展观、资料数据准确可靠和()
关于中水给水系统的安装要求,正确的有()。A.中水管道每层需装设一个水嘴 B
女,48岁。发作性剑突下及右上腹绞痛3天,伴有寒战,半年前有类似发作史。查体:T
最新回复
(
0
)