首页
登录
职称英语
Business has slowed, layoffs mount, but executive pay continues to roar—at l
Business has slowed, layoffs mount, but executive pay continues to roar—at l
游客
2023-08-14
36
管理
问题
Business has slowed, layoffs mount, but executive pay continues to roar—at least so far. Business Week’s annual survey finds that chief executive officers (CEOs) at 365 of the largest US companies got compensation last year averaging $3.1 million—up 1.3 percent from 1994.
Why are the top bosses getting an estimated 485 times the pay of a typical factory worker? That is up from 475 times in 1999 and a mere 42 times in 1980. One reason may be what experts call the "Lake Wobegon effect". Corporate boards tend to reckon that "all CEOs are above average"—a play on Garrison Keillor’s famous line in his public radio show, A Prairie Home Companion, that all the town’s children are "above average". Consultants provide boards with surveys of corporate CEO compensation. Since directors are reluctant to regard their CEOs as below average, the compensation committees of boards tend to set pay at an above-average level.
The result: Pay levels get ratcheted up.
Defenders of lavish CEO pay argue there is such a strong demand for experienced CEOs that the free market forces their pay up. They further maintain most boards structure pay packages to reflect an executive’s performance. They get paid more if their companies and their stock do well. So companies with high-paid CEOs generate great wealth for their shareholders.
But the supposed cream-of-the-crop executives did surprisingly poorly for their shareholders in 1999, says Scott Klinger, author of this report by a Boston-based Organization United for a Fair Economy. If an investor had put $10,000 apiece at the end of 1999 into the stock of those companies with the 10 highest-paid CEOs, by year-end 2000 the investment would have shrunk to $8,132. If $10,000 had been put into the Standard & Poor’s 500 stocks, it would have been worth $9,090. To Mr. Klinger, these findings suggest that the theory that one person, the CEO, is responsible for creating most of a corporation’s value is dead wrong. "It takes many employees to make a corporation profitable."
With profits down, corporate boards may make more effort to tame executive compensation. And executives are making greater efforts to avoid pay cut. Since CEOs, seeing their options "under water" or worthless because of falling stock prices, are seeking more pay in cash or in restricted stock. [br] Which of the following statements is true about Garrison Keillor?
选项
A、His idea on the CEOs was recognized by corporate boards.
B、One of his lines had been modified to describe the CEOs.
C、His play pointed out that "all CEOs are above average".
D、His radio program aroused the "Lake Wobegon effect".
答案
B
解析
原文第2段第4句中的破折号后的内容表明“all CEOs are above average”这一说法是对Garrison Keillor的某句台词的修改,故选项B为本题答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/2924740.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]Americacontinuestoleadtheworldasadestinationforinte
[originaltext]Americacontinuestoleadtheworldasadestinationforinte
[originaltext]Startingabusinessisnevereasy.ButanorganizationlikeT
[originaltext]If(13)NewZealandbusinessmanGarethMorganhashisdruthers,
[originaltext]If(13)NewZealandbusinessmanGarethMorganhashisdruthers,
[originaltext]If(13)NewZealandbusinessmanGarethMorganhashisdruthers,
Dr.AlanHirschdesignssmellsforbusinesses.Hesaysthatitdoesn’ttake
Dr.AlanHirschdesignssmellsforbusinesses.Hesaysthatitdoesn’ttake
Dr.AlanHirschdesignssmellsforbusinesses.Hesaysthatitdoesn’ttake
MarkRamirez,aseniorexecutiveatAOL,couldworkinthemostcomfortable
随机试题
一个人的生命究竟有多大意义,这有什么标准可以衡量吗?提出一个绝对的标准当然很困难。但是,大体上看一个人对待生命的态度是否严肃认真,看他对待劳动、工作等等
[audioFiles]audio_eusm_j45_001(20082)[/audioFiles]A、He’seagertostarthisnew
建筑石膏的使用性能何者不正确?( )A.干燥时不开裂 B.耐水性强 C.机
9岁女孩,寒战,高热,咳脓痰2天。查体:体温39.2℃,左肺闻及湿性啰音,X线胸
公路工程设计年限一般按等级控制在( )。 A、10~20年 B、15~3
在消费者购房过程中,房屋信息搜索耗费了消费者大量的()等摩擦成本。A.机会成
在教育教学活动中,对学生的不良行为视而不见、不问不管或对学生讽刺、挖苦、实施体罚
财政政策的手段包括()。A.降低利率 B.增减预算支出水平 C.增减政府税
下列关于公共物品或服务的提供及受益范围的表述中,错误的是( )。A.纯公共物品
关于习近平法治思想核心要义的下列表述中,正确的有()。A.坚持党对全面依法
最新回复
(
0
)