2. 职称英语
  3. Politicians beware. Software can examine legislative bills, working out the【

Politicians beware. Software can examine legislative bills, working out the【

游客2023-08-05  10
问题     Politicians beware. Software can examine legislative bills, working out the【C1】________of the text. It could allow voters to see who【C2】________determines what goes into bills.
    There is a long history of companies and other vested interests【C3】________legislation by lobbying (游说) politicians. So researchers at the University of Chicago’s Data Science for Social Good programme have created the Legislative Influence Detector. This traces the text of US bills, searching for passages that have been cribbed (抄袭) from lobbyists or the legislatures of other states.
    To get the real story behind a bill, the software【C4】________through 500, 000 state bills, as well as thousands of pieces of text drafted by lobbyist groups that were saved into a database. An algorithm (运算程序 ) then calculates die top 100 documents most【C5】________to the bill in question before examining each one more closely, searching for passages the two have in common.
    The software can turn up lines of text【C6】________written by activists and special interest groups. Or it might find that the bill borrows largely from laws already in place elsewhere, giving【C7】________citizens the chance to explore how the policy worked out there.
    The detector is the latest in a string of projects that try to use computers to hold governments to【C8】________. At the University of Texas at Arlington, computer scientist Chengkai Li is building a system to fact-check the【C9】________of politicians in real time. Li envisions a final platform that can scan through the transcript of a speech or presidential debate, picking out the lines that we already know to be true or false so journalists can work on【C10】________more complicated claims.
    A) account         F) digs            K) remarks
    B) actually        G) exactly         L) sees
    C) checking        H) influencing     M) similar
    D) concerned       I) originally      N) source
    E) curious         J) relevant        O) statements [br] 【C6】
选项
答案 I
解析 副词辨析题。空格位于过去分词、written之前，并可以看出该分词结构是名词词组lines of text的后置定语，因此判断空格处应该填入副词，修饰过去分词written。从上文可以看出，文章所说的软件是为了探究一个法案的幕后真相，找到它真实的来源，换言之就是找到初创者。由此可知答案为I)originally“起初，原本”。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/2899049.html
相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)