首页
登录
职称英语
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
游客
2023-07-18
29
管理
问题
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on 29 November by Undergrad, a Students’ Union magazine of our university. The main purpose behind the election was to give teachers an opportunity to review their teaching methods in light of the results.
Our concern is whether the election of one single teacher from each faculty by undergraduate students will substantially improve the quality of teaching. Surely this would be much better achieved by an extensive and standardized course-evaluation system.
According to the article on page 33 of the 3rd edition of Undergrad, the writer and his colleagues decided that it was time to "get their own back" on the teachers. There appears to be a strong aggressive tone on the whole. This seems contrary to the motive originally intended. We fear that an "unpopularity poll" is what really results.
This election was governed by the regulations of the Best Teacher Award, which required a minimum of 15 percent of voters for the results to be valid. However, as there was a very poor turnout, 17 of the "winners" were elected by less than 15 percent, which greatly reduced the representativeness of the outcome.
The teachers involved are not even given details of the masons for voting. We wonder how the organizing body can help these teachers improve their teaching methods when the evidence for their performance cannot be produced. The whole exercise is therefore worthless without these reasons made available.
A few popular newspapers have reported on the election, but the data shown are misleading. They do not show how many students voted for the teachers, merely rows of vague percentages. Most of the articles do not even state the results of the election, but only the names of elected teachers. We object to their irresponsible behaviour to both the voters and teachers alike. We believe the whole university wishes to strive for excellence in a constructive way.
Our conclusion is that the Worst Teacher Award has, from the beginning, lost sight of its virtuous purpose and has turned into something that destroys the image of our university teachers and, far worse, the mutual relationship between teachers and students. [br] It can be inferred from the passage that ______.
选项
A、the bad teachers will be highly motivated by the constructive results of the survey
B、the reports in most articles should avoid mentioning the names of those elected had teachers
C、the election will help improve the teacher-student relationship
D、the rules for electing the worst teachers were made without the approval of the university
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/2847348.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]W:Excuseme,wouldyoumindansweringafewquestions?M:Well,
[originaltext]W:Excuseme,wouldyoumindansweringafewquestions?M:Well,
[originaltext]W:Excuseme,wouldyoumindansweringafewquestions?M:Well,
[originaltext]W:Excuseme,wouldyoumindansweringafewquestions?M:Well,
AnewreportreleasedbytheAmericanFederationofTeachers(AFT)remindsu
[originaltext]W:AlexisanEnglishteacherinIranandtodaywe’dliketoshar
[originaltext]W:AlexisanEnglishteacherinIranandtodaywe’dliketoshar
[originaltext]W:Howcanourhistoryteachergiveussuchadifficultassignmen
[originaltext]W:Howcanourhistoryteachergiveussuchadifficultassignmen
[originaltext]W:Howcanourhistoryteachergiveussuchadifficultassignmen
随机试题
Targetyesterday【C1】______WallStreetexpectationswhenit【C2】______a21.1perce
被称为“90后”(thepost-90s)的中国新生一代拥有一种完全不同于父辈的文化。他们是首批伴随着互联网长大的一代。在网络平台上,“90后”以多种
A.7 B.8 C.15 D.16 E.31
右图中的塑料垫块,主要用在()部位。A.板 B.梁 C.柱 D.垫层
男,74岁,咽喉部不适一年余,近两三个月咽喉疼痛,吞咽困难,CT如图所示,最可能
突发耳鸣,声大如潮,按之不减者属A.肾精亏损 B.阴虚火旺 C.肝肾阴虚
A.血清铁增高、血清铁蛋白正常 B.血清铁、铁蛋白均降低 C.血清铁增高、血
欣赏中外优秀美术作品,属于课程基本理念的()。A.体现时代性、基础性和选择性,满
一般资料:求助者,男性,17岁,高二学生。 案例介绍:因与同学、老师的关系不融
关于工程量清单计价下施工企业投标报价原则的说法,正确的有( )。A.投标报价由
最新回复
(
0
)