首页
登录
职称英语
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
游客
2023-07-18
46
管理
问题
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on 29 November by Undergrad, a Students’ Union magazine of our university. The main purpose behind the election was to give teachers an opportunity to review their teaching methods in light of the results.
Our concern is whether the election of one single teacher from each faculty by undergraduate students will substantially improve the quality of teaching. Surely this would be much better achieved by an extensive and standardized course-evaluation system.
According to the article on page 33 of the 3rd edition of Undergrad, the writer and his colleagues decided that it was time to "get their own back" on the teachers. There appears to be a strong aggressive tone on the whole. This seems contrary to the motive originally intended. We fear that an "unpopularity poll" is what really results.
This election was governed by the regulations of the Best Teacher Award, which required a minimum of 15 percent of voters for the results to be valid. However, as there was a very poor turnout, 17 of the "winners" were elected by less than 15 percent, which greatly reduced the representativeness of the outcome.
The teachers involved are not even given details of the masons for voting. We wonder how the organizing body can help these teachers improve their teaching methods when the evidence for their performance cannot be produced. The whole exercise is therefore worthless without these reasons made available.
A few popular newspapers have reported on the election, but the data shown are misleading. They do not show how many students voted for the teachers, merely rows of vague percentages. Most of the articles do not even state the results of the election, but only the names of elected teachers. We object to their irresponsible behaviour to both the voters and teachers alike. We believe the whole university wishes to strive for excellence in a constructive way.
Our conclusion is that the Worst Teacher Award has, from the beginning, lost sight of its virtuous purpose and has turned into something that destroys the image of our university teachers and, far worse, the mutual relationship between teachers and students. [br] The phrase "to get their own back on the teachers" (Line 2, Para. 3) most probably means that the students would ______.
选项
A、have their revenge on the teachers
B、be at their teachers’ back
C、assess their teachers back to back
D、turn their back on the teachers
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/2847344.html
相关试题推荐
Forthisproblem,ourteacher’sideaisthat______(那个计划应该立即执行).theplan(should)b
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
随机试题
Afacialexpressionresultsfromoneormoremotionsorpositionsofthemus
一、题目 试述审计信息化的目标和主要内容 二、背景与答题要求 加快审
下列关于肺血管的描述错误的是A.肺有双重血流供应,即肺循环和支气管循环 B.肺
《天演论》
我国社保基金由()两部分组成。A:社会保障基金 B:社会保险基金 C:证券投
基础心理学是研究()。 (A)正常成人心理现象的心理学基础学科 (B
治疗乳痈的基本原则是A.以消为贵 B.清热解毒 C.以通为主 D.彻底排脓
在通信市场,()因素可能造成构成市场进入壁垒。A.规模经济; B.巨额的资本投
某企业为增值税一般纳税人,主要生产甲、乙两种产品,适用乙产品消费税税率为8%。
(2020年真题)王先生拟投资某个茶饮项目,需要一次性投资100000元,王先生
最新回复
(
0
)