2. 职称英语
  3. One of the bitterest and most time-worn debates in student union bars up and

One of the bitterest and most time-worn debates in student union bars up and

游客2023-07-16  64
问题     One of the bitterest and most time-worn debates in student union bars up and down the country is resolved as academic research confirms that in financial terms at least, arts degrees are a complete waste of time.
    Getting through university boosts students’ earnings by 25%, on a weighted average, or ￡220,000 over their lifetime, according to Professor Ian Walker of Warwick University—but if they study Shakespeare or the peasants’ revolt instead of anatomy or contract law, those gains are likely to be completely wiped out.
    The government is about to allow universities to charge students up to ￡3,000 a year for their degrees, arguing that it’s a small price to pay compared with the financial rewards graduates reap later in life. But Prof. Walker’s research shows there are sharp variations in returns according to which subject a student takes.
    Law, medicine and economics or business are the most lucrative choices, making their average earnings 25% higher, according to the article, published in the office for national statistics’ monthly journal. Scientists get 10-15% extra. At the bottom of the list are arts subjects, which make only a "small" difference to earnings—a small negative one, in fact. Just ahead are degrees in education—which leave hard pressed teachers an average of 5% better off a year than if they had left school at 18.
    "It’s hard to resist the conclusion that what students learn does matter a lot; and some subject areas give more modest financial returns than others," Prof. Walker said. As an economist, he was quick to point out that students might gain non-financial returns from arts degrees: "Studying economics might be very dull, for example, and studying post-modernism might be a lot of fun." [br] Law, medical and business graduates could earn 25% more than______.
选项 A、education graduates
B、arts graduates
C、those who hadn’t studied at the university
D、the national average income
答案 C
解析 事实细节题。第4段中出现了几个比较数字，考题要求找到此段首句提到的收入增加25％的参照点。第2段第1句中的Getting through university表明这类学生收人增加25％的参照对象是没读大学的人，且从第4段第3句中的the list和第4句即可以确定这一段是在比较大学毕业与18岁毕业(即没读大学)收入的不同，因此C正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/2843394.html
相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)