首页
登录
职称英语
If you’re thinking about relocating for a new job, there’s a good chance you
If you’re thinking about relocating for a new job, there’s a good chance you
游客
2023-07-15
37
管理
问题
If you’re thinking about relocating for a new job, there’s a good chance you may have to cover your own moving costs, even if you’ve got a job offer.
When you search for openings on the major job boards lately, lots of the ads say: "No relocation assistance is provided." For those positions that do offer to pay moving costs, the payments are often capped, sometimes below $10 000. With the typical corporate relocation costing about $60 000 for homeowners and $18 000 for renters, such an expense can cause economic hardship for job seekers. That is, if you’re lucky enough to even get a job offer when applying for jobs in other towns, states or countries.
Some employers aren’t even looking at out-of-town applicants these days because there are so many great candidates right in their own backyards, recruitment experts said. Some don’t want to deal with an employee who might not be able to sell their home to move, thanks to the dismal (惨淡的) housing market. That’s bad news for job seekers looking to relocate to a region with more job opportunities. "A lot of people are landlocked (内陆的) because companies want to pay less, not more, to bring in new talent," said Nancy Keene, director at recruiting firm Stanton Chase.
When the economy is strong, employers sometimes go to great lengths to find the best talent no matter where they live. Before the recession, that meant lucrative relocation packages that covered moving expenses, house-hunting trips, and even money toward selling a house or buying a new one, especially for executive-level employees.
But now, such perks (津贴) are being cut just like so many other employee benefits. An October poll conducted by the Society for Human Resource Management found that 19 percent of companies had cut employee benefits in the last six months because of the economy. Among those: 17 percent eliminated corporate-relocation programs entirely; 25 percent froze corporate-relocation programs; 58 percent reduced corporate-relocation programs.
And that means more job seekers who want to move to accept a new position are on their own. "We see a huge trend of people moving for jobs but paying for their own relocation," said Kimberly Smith, owner of corporate housing company Avenue West Corporate Housing. Many of those individuals who are also homeowners are becoming "accidental landlords", she said, because they are forced to rent out their home. [br] Many homeowners are renting out their houses because______.
选项
A、they have more than one house
B、they don’t live there any more
C、they move to other places for work
D、they want to earn more money
答案
C
解析
综合推断题。根据原文内容可知,很多房屋所有人正成为“意外的房东”,因为他们不得不出租自己的房子,结合前面提到的很多人换了工作后要自己支付搬家费用不难推断,房屋所有人出租房子的原因是他们要搬到离工作近的地方去,故C)“他们搬到其他地方工作”为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/2840054.html
相关试题推荐
Tosleep.Perchance(古英文,或许)tofile?Findingspublishedonlinethisweekby
Tosleep.Perchance(古英文,或许)tofile?Findingspublishedonlinethisweekby
Tosleep.Perchance(古英文,或许)tofile?Findingspublishedonlinethisweekby
Tosleep.Perchance(古英文,或许)tofile?Findingspublishedonlinethisweekby
______(如果你对生意不投入)chancesareyouwillgobankrupt.Ifyouputnoeffortintoyou
Whenshouldanyvacationsfromthinkingbetaken?Inthissection,youwill
Whenshouldanyvacationsfromthinkingbetaken?Inthissection,youwill
Whenshouldanyvacationsfromthinkingbetaken?Inthissection,youwill
Whenshouldanyvacationsfromthinkingbetaken?Inthissection,youwill
[originaltext]W:Hi,Jack!Whatissointeresting?M:Hi,Jane.I’mthinkingab
随机试题
Whatarethespeakerstryingtodecide?[br][originaltext]MInoticedtheNew
Thethousandsofpeopleforcedtoabandontheirhomesinrecentweekstoflo
某境外游客在接近用餐时提出将中餐换成西餐,而用餐的餐厅无此项服务,导游可建议其去
在我国四大名砚中,被称为“艺林瑰宝”的砚台是()。A.端砚 B.歙砚 C.洮
患者,男,45岁。行胆总管切开取石、T形管引流术。术后第3天,护士查房时发现T管
文书倾向测试属于()测试。 A.职业兴趣B.职业能力C.职业人格D.学
下列说法不正确的是()。A.通过期货交易形成的价格具有周期性 B.系统风险对
德国人凡代克曾在中国工作,经常居所在德国,在德国有一处房产,并在两国的银行均有存
根据物权法律制度的规定,下列选项中属于添附的有()。A.先占 B.加工
下列关于项目参与各方项目管理的表述中,正确的是()。A.业主方项目管理的投资目标
最新回复
(
0
)