首页
登录
职称英语
The Gulf Between College Students and Librarians A)Students rarely ask l
The Gulf Between College Students and Librarians A)Students rarely ask l
游客
2023-06-29
31
管理
问题
The Gulf Between College Students and Librarians
A)Students rarely ask librarians for help, even when they need it. This is one of the sobering(令人警醒的)truths the librarians have learned over the course of a two-year, five-campus ethnographic(人种学的)study examining how students view and use their campus libraries. The idea of a librarian as an academic expert who is available to talk about assignments and hold their hands through the research process is, in fact, foreign to most students. Those who even have the word "librarian" in their vocabularies often think library staff are only good for pointing to different sections of the stacks.
B)The ERIAL(Ethnographic Research in Illinois Academic Libraries)project contains a series of studies conducted at Illinois Wesleyan, DePaul University, and Northeastern Illinois University, and the University of Illinois’s Chicago and Springfield campuses. Instead of relying on surveys, the libraries included two anthropologists(人类学家), along with their own staff members, to collect data using open-ended interviews and direct observation, among other methods. The goal was to generate data that, rather than being statistically significant yet shallow, would provide deep, subjective accounts of what students, librarians and professors think of the library and each other at those five institutions.
C)The most alarming finding in the ERIAL studies was perhaps the most predictable: when it comes to finding and evaluating sources in the Internet age, students are extremely Internet-dependent. Only 7 out of 30 students whom anthropologists observed at Illinois Wesleyan "conducted what a librarian might consider a reasonably well-executed search," wrote Duke and Andrew Asher, an anthropology professor at Bucknell University, who led the project.
D)Throughout the interviews, students mentioned Google 115 times—more than twice as many times as any other database. The prevalence of Google in student research is well-documented, but the Illinois researchers found something they did not expect: students were not very good at using Google. They were basically clueless about the logic underlying how the search engine organizes and displays its results. Consequently, the students did not know how to build a search that would return good sources. "I think it really exploded this myth of the ’digital native’," Asher said. "Just because you’ve grown up searching things in Google doesn’t mean you know how to use Google as a good research tool. "
E)Even when students turned to more scholarly resources, it did not necessarily solve the problem. Many seemed confused about where in the constellation(云集)of library databases they should turn to locate sources for their particular research topic: Half wound up misusing databases a librarian "would most likely never recommend for their topic." For example, "Students regularly used JSTOR, the second-most frequently mentioned database in student interviews, to try to find current research on a topic, not realizing that JSTOR does not provide access to the most recently published articles." Unsurprisingly, students using this method got either too many search results or too few. Frequently, students would be so discouraged that they would change their research topic to something that requires a simple search.
F)"Many students described experiences of anxiety and confusion when looking for resources—an observation that seems to be widespread among students at the five institutions involved in this study," Duke and Asher wrote. There was just one problem, Duke and Asher noted: "Students showed an almost complete lack of interest in seeking assistance from librarians during the search process." Of all the students they observed—many of whom struggled to find good sources, to the point of despair—not one asked a librarian for help.
G)In a separate study of students at DePaul, Illinois-Chicago, and Northeastern Illinois, other ERIAL researchers deduced several possible reasons for this. The most basic was that students were just as unaware of the extent of their own information illiteracy as everyone else. Some others overestimated their ability or knowledge. Another possible reason was that students seek help from sources they know and trust, and they do not know librarians. Many do not even know what the librarians are there for. Other students imagined librarians to have more research-oriented knowledge of the library but still thought of them as glorified ushers.
H)However, the researchers did not place the blame solely on students. Librarians and professors are also partially to blame for the gulf that has opened between students and the library employees who are supposed to help them, the ERIAL researchers say. Instead of librarians, whose relationship to any given student is typically ill-defined, students seeking help often turn to a more logical source: the person who gave them the assignment—and who, ultimately, will be grading their work. Because librarians hold little sway with students, they can do only so much to reshape students’ habits. They need professors’ help. Unfortunately, faculty may have low expectations for librarians, and consequently students may not be connected to librarians or see why working with librarians may be helpful. On the other hand, librarians tend to overestimate the research skills of some of their students, which can result in interactions that leave students feeling intimidated and alienated(疏远的). Some professors make similar assumptions, and fail to require that their students visit with a librarian before carrying on research projects. And both professors and librarians are liable to project an idealistic view of the research process onto students who often are not willing or able to fulfill it.
I)By financial necessity, many of today’s students have limited time to devote to their research. Showing students the pool and then shoving them into the deep end is more likely to foster despair than self-reliance. Now more than ever, academic librarians should seek to "save time for the reader". Before they can do that, of course, they will have to actually get students to ask for help. "That means understanding why students are not asking for help and knowing what kind of help they need," say the librarians.
J)"This study has changed, profoundly, how I see my role at the university and my understanding of who our students are," says Lynda Duke, an academic librarian at Illinois Wesleyan. "It’s been life-changing, truly." [br] It surprised Illinois researchers that students were not good at using Google.
选项
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/2794210.html
相关试题推荐
Veryfewpeoplecangetacollegedegreebefore11,butMichaelwasan【B1】__
Veryfewpeoplecangetacollegedegreebefore11,butMichaelwasan【B1】__
Veryfewpeoplecangetacollegedegreebefore11,butMichaelwasan【B1】__
Veryfewpeoplecangetacollegedegreebefore11,butMichaelwasan【B1】__
Foryears,highschoolstudentshavereceivedidenticaltextbooksastheirc
Foryears,highschoolstudentshavereceivedidenticaltextbooksastheirc
InLondon,overhalfofthehomesbuiltbetween1919and1980hadonegarage
InLondon,overhalfofthehomesbuiltbetween1919and1980hadonegarage
InLondon,overhalfofthehomesbuiltbetween1919and1980hadonegarage
[originaltext]Thefirstyearofcollegeisoneofthebestandthemostint
随机试题
关于数值修约规则错误的是()。A.某沥青的针入度平均值80.5,得针入度结
急性胆管炎的Charcot三联征是指()A.腹痛、畏寒发热、胆囊肿大 B.
股票基金分类方式不包括( )。A.按收益率分类 B.按股票性质分类 C.按
腻苔的特征是A.苔质颗粒疏松,揩之可去 B.苔质颗粒细腻致密,揩之不去 C.
国务院药品监督管理部门根据保护公众健康的要求,可以对药品生产企业生产的新药品种设
“笔墨当随时代。”_。时代主题的转换要求文艺面对生活调整自身的姿态。随着时代主题
可转换债券的转换平价是指使可转换债券市场价值(即市场价格)等于该可转换债券转换
(2017年真题)刘婆婆回家途中,看见邻居肖婆婆带着外孙小勇和另一家邻居的孩子小
红旗机械厂与白云金融公司签订了租赁合同,约定由白云公司从现代制造公司购买3台AA
关于FIDIC《EPC交钥匙项目合同条件》特点的说法,正确的是( )。(201
最新回复
(
0
)