首页
登录
职称英语
Various studies have shown that increased spending on education has not led
Various studies have shown that increased spending on education has not led
游客
2023-06-26
66
管理
问题
Various studies have shown that increased spending on education has not led to measurable improvements in learning. Between 1980 and 2008, staff and teachers at US public schools grew roughly twice as fast as students. Yet students showed no additional learning in achievement tests.
Universities show similar trends of increased administration personnel and costs without greater learning, as documented in Richard Arum and Josipa Roksa’s recent book Academically Adrift:Limited Learning on College Campuses.
A survey shows that 63% of employers say that recent college graduates don’t have the skills they need to succeed and 25% of employers say that entry-level writing skills are lacking.
Some simplistically attribute the decline in our public education system to the drain of skilled students by private schools, but far more significant events were at work.
Public schools worked well until about the 1970s. In fact, until that time, public schools provided far better education than private ones. It was the underperforming students who were thrown out of public schools and went to private ones.
A prominent reason public schools did well was that many highly qualified women had few options for working outside the house other than being teachers or nurses. They accepted relatively low pay,difficult working conditions, and gave their very best.
Having such a large supply of talented women teachers meant that society could pay less for their services. Women’s liberation opened up new professional opportunities for women, and, over time, some of the best left teaching as a career option, bringing about a gradual decline in the quality of schooling.
Also around that time, regulations, government, and unions came to dictate pay, prevent adjustments, and introduce bureaucratic (官僚的)standard for advancement. Large education bureaucracies and unions came to dominate the landscape, confusing activity with achievement. Bureaucrats regularly rewrite curriculums, talk nonsense about theories of education, and require ever more administrators. The end result has been that, after all the spending, students have worse math and reading skills than both their foreign peers and earlier generations spending far less on education— as all the accumulating evidence now documents. [br] What do we learn from various studies on America’s public education?
选项
A、Achievement tests have failed to truly reflect the quality of teaching.
B、Public schools lack the resources to compete with private schools.
C、Little improvement in education has resulted from increased spending.
D、The number of students has increased much faster than that of teachers.
答案
C
解析
原文第一段第一句指出,教育投入的增加并没有带来学习效果的显著提高,所以C“增加投入几乎没有带来教育改善”符合文意,故为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/2785175.html
相关试题推荐
中国的教育体制分为三个阶段:基础教育、高等教育和成人教育。基础教育包括学前教育(pre-schooleducation)、小学和中学。高等教育由职业专科
Studieshavehintedthatbreastcancersurvivorstendtogainweightaftert
Studieshavehintedthatbreastcancersurvivorstendtogainweightaftert
WhatIfACollegeEducationJustIsn’tforEveryone?[A]Longbeforethe
WhatIfACollegeEducationJustIsn’tforEveryone?[A]Longbeforethe
WhatIfACollegeEducationJustIsn’tforEveryone?[A]Longbeforethe
WhatIfACollegeEducationJustIsn’tforEveryone?[A]Longbeforethe
WhatIfACollegeEducationJustIsn’tforEveryone?[A]Longbeforethe
WhatIfACollegeEducationJustIsn’tforEveryone?[A]Longbeforethe
WhatIfACollegeEducationJustIsn’tforEveryone?[A]Longbeforethe
随机试题
Ms.BarbM
Thisisaroadwithmany______turns,youmustpaymuchattentiontothewalker.
[originaltext]Wouldyoutrustarobottoparkyourcar?Thequestionwillc
男,21岁,因外伤完全脱落而来诊。关于治疗方法的选择错误的是A.外伤半小时内立即
年轻女性,24岁,停经3个月,少量阴道出血,时出时停,偶有下腹痛,妇科检查:宫颈
下列哪些投资者视为当然合格投资者( ) Ⅰ.社会保障基金 Ⅱ.企业年金等养
19世纪初,对班级组织的发展产生巨大推动作用的“导生制”出现在()。A.德国
商业银行的下列风险评级中,评级结果不包含违约概率的是()。A.国别评级 B.主
下列各项中,在企业所有者权益变动表中单独列示反映的信息有()。A.会计政策变
银行承兑汇票的承兑银行,应当按照票面金额向出票人收取()的手续费。A:千分之一
最新回复
(
0
)