2. 学历类
  3. Text 2 The UK government's decision to s

Text 2 The UK government's decision to s

免费题库2022-08-02  56
问题 Text 2 The UK government's decision to shutter plans to build the world's first tidal lagoon off Swansea Bay is a hard blow for Wales.The tidal lagoon project,had it gone ahead,was expected to create 2,200 jobs,plus more in the supply chain.These are the kinds of jobs that Wales,so damaged by steel and coal closures,needs.But the business secretary,Greg Clark,has decided the country can't have them because they would be too expensive.Welsh politicians have reacted with understandable fury to Mr Clark's announcement,which comes almost exactly 12 months after the government abandoned plans to electrify the railway from Cardiff to Swansea,and just a day after Member of Parliament（MPs）voted to press ahead with another expensive infrastructure project:a third runway at Heathrow.There are some rational reasons to approve of this week's decision,while regretting its consequences.No one,including the Tidal Lagoon Power company,denied that the electricity produced off the Welsh coast would have cost more than the cheapest renewables,The most recent government auctions saw offshore wind schemes win contracts at record lows of￡57.50 per megawatt hour,meaning they are within a few pounds of being subsidy-free.But cost is not the only consideration.Otherwise,the government would never have gone ahead with the hugely expensive,risky and uncertain Hinkley Point C nuclear power station.Nor would it have cut subsidies for solar power and onshore wind,as it did in 2015.Those decisions-particularly the promise to curb onshore wind,as the Conservatives did in their 2015 manifest0,despite poll after poll showing that a majority of the public prefers wind and solar to nuclear-were ideological.In a City speech this March,Mr Clark praised business for putting"evidence before ideology".It is welcome that the secretary of state says this is his own approach.Too many of his Conservative colleagues remain too strongly attached to fossil fuels,inclu'ding the prospect of a whole new shale gas industry.As the price of renewables continues to fall,they will surely lose the argument.With Mr Clark in charge,the hope is that onshore wind and solar subsidies may soon return-though too late for UK companies that could have developed and profited from the technology had we not given up on it long before the renewables boom.Yet the government is planning more nuclear power stations,including one in Wales.Different rules seem to apply for different technologies.It looks like a Tory government in Westminster snubbed Welsh Labour's pet project.Backers of the tidal project felt shut out by ministers.Wave energy lobbyists perhaps don't have the firepower in Whitehall that others can muster.Mr Clark might have relied on the evidence to make a tough call not to back a new,green technology.But it's hard to shake off the impression that the decision was one rooted in the partisan politics of self-interest.The author's attitude toward the government's decision on wave energy seems to be one of____A.approvalB.sarcasmC.toleranceD.objectiveness
选项 A.approval
B.sarcasm
C.tolerance
D.objectiveness
答案 B
解析 [信息锁定]末段段首承上指出．（英国不重视可再生能源导致企业受损，但）政府还在计划更多的核电站，不思改变。末两句总结指出，商务大臣Cla rk可能越于切实的证据做出当前不支持新能源的艰难抉择，但这也很难让人不觉得政府决议还是基于党派一己之私的结果。可见作者对于政府决议最终是“不赞同、嘲讽”的。B.正确。[解题技巧]A.和C.分别基于第三段首句rational reasons．但该段总体为“让步”功能：先肯定潮汐能太贵，后转而强调其被拒不只是所谓的成本问题，下文继而揭示问题所在，即保守党的专权、私利之举，作者在一定程度上确实认可Clark大臣本人．但对于政府决议并不支持或容忍。全文从第四段起作者开始摆出观点，直至文末以嘲讽语气做出评论，都体现其主观看法．故D.错误。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/xueli/2699619.html
本试题收录于： 英语二研究生题库研究生入学分类

英语二研究生

研究生入学

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)