根据以下材料,回答31-35题 Enlightening, challengi

资格题库2022-08-02  53

问题 根据以下材料,回答31-35题Enlightening, challenging, stimulating, fun. These were some of the words that Nature readers used to describe their experience of art-science collaborations in a series of articles on partnerships between artists and researchers. Nearly 40% of the roughly 350 people who responded to an accompanying poll said, they had collaborated with artists; and almost all said they would consider doing so in future.Such an encouraging results is not surprising. Scientists are increasingly seeking out visual artists to help them communicate their work to new audiences. "Artists help scientists reach a broader audience and make emotional connections that enhance learning." One respondent said.One example of how artists and scientists have together rocked the scenes came last month when the Sydney Symphony Orchestra performed a reworked version of Antonio Vivaldi's The Four Seasons. They reimagined the 300-year-old score by injecting the latest climate prediction data for each season-provided by Monash Univerity’s Climate Change Communication Research Hub. The performance was a creative call to action ahead of November’s United Nations Climate Change Conference in Glasgow, UK.But a genuine partnership must be a two-way street. Fewer artist than scientists responded to the Nature poll, however, several respondents noted that artists do not simply assist scientists with their communication requirements. Nor should their work be considered only as an object of study. The alliances are most valuable when scientists and artists have a shared stake in a project, are able to jointly design it and can critique each other's work. Such an approach can both prompt new research as well as result in powerful art.More than half a century ago, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology opened its Center for Advanced Visual Studies (CAVS) to explore the role of technology in culture. The founders deliberately focused their projects around light-hance the "visual studies" in the name. Light was a something that both artists and scientists had an interest in, and therefore could form the basis of collaboration. As science and technology progressed, and divided into more sub-disciplines, the centre was simultaneously looking to a time when leading researchers could also be artists, writers and poets, and vice versa.Nature’s poll findings suggest that this trend is as strong as ever, but, to make a collaboration work, both sides need to invest time, and embrace surprise and challenge. The reach of art-science tie-ups needs to go beyond the necessary purpose of research communication, and participants. Artists and scientists alike are immersed in discovery and invention, and challenge and critique are core to both, too.Some artists seem to worry about in the art-science partnership_____. ?A.their role may be underestimated?B.their reputation may be impaired?C.their creativity may be inhibited?D.their work may be misguided

选项 A.their role may be underestimated
?
B.their reputation may be impaired
?
C.their creativity may be inhibited
?
D.their work may be misguided

答案 A

解析 Fewer artist than scientists responded to the Nature poll,接受《自然》杂志调查的艺术家比科学家少,several respondents noted that artists do not simply assist scientists with their communication requirements. Nor should their work be considered only as an object of study. The alliances are most valuable when scientists and artists have a shared stake in a project?一些受访者指出,艺术家并不简单地帮助科学家完成他们的沟通要求。他们的工作也不应仅仅被视为一个研究的对象。当科学家和艺术家在一个项目中拥有共同的利益时,这些结盟是最有价值的,由此得出,艺术家担心自己仅仅被视为一个用来沟通的工具,自己重要性被低估了低估了,A正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/xueli/2699230.html

最新回复(0)