首页
登录
学历类
Any fair-minded assessment of the danger
Any fair-minded assessment of the danger
最全题库
2022-08-02
53
问题
Any fair-minded assessment of the dangers of the deal between Britain’s National Health Service (NHS) and DeepMind must start by acknowledging that both sides mean well. DeepMind is one of the leading artificial intelligence (AI) companies in the world. The potential of this work applied to healthcare is very great, but it could also lead to further concentration of power in the tech giants. It Is against that background that the information commissioner, Elizabeth Denham, has issued her damning verdict against the Royal Free hospital trust under the NHS, which handed over to DeepMind the records of 1.6 million patients In 2015 on the basis of a vague agreement which took far too little account of the patients’ rights and their expectations of privacy. DeepMind has almost apologized. The NHS trust has mended its ways. Further arrangements- and there may be many-between the NHS and DeepMind will be carefully scrutinised to ensure that all necessary permissions have been asked of patients and all unnecessary data has been cleaned. There are lessons about informed patient consent to learn. But privacy is not the only angle in this case and not even the most important. Ms. Denham chose to concentrate the blame on the NHS trust, since under existing law it “controlled” the data and DeepMind merely “processed” it. But this distinction misses the point that it is processing and aggregation, not the mere possession of bits, that gives the data value. The great question is who should benefit from the analysis of all the data that our lives now generate. Privacy law builds on the concept of damage to an individual from identifiable knowledge about them. That misses the way the surveillance economy works. The data of an individual there gains its value only when it is compared with the data of countless millions more. The use of privacy law to curb the tech giants in this instance feels slightly maladapted. This practice does not address the real worry. It is not enough to say that the algorithms DeepMind develops will benefit patients and save lives. What matters is that they will belong to a private monopoly which developed them using public resources. If software promises to save lives on the scale that dugs now can, big data may be expected to behave as a big pharm has done. We are still at the beginning of this revolution and small choices now may turn out to have gigantic consequences later. A long struggle will be needed to avoid a future of digital feudalism. Ms Denham’s report is a welcome start.According to the last paragraph, the real worry arising from this deal is _____.A. the vicious rivalry among big pharmas.B. the ineffective enforcement of privacy law.C. the uncontrolled use of new software.D. the monopoly of big data by tech giants.
选项
A. the vicious rivalry among big pharmas.
B. the ineffective enforcement of privacy law.
C. the uncontrolled use of new software.
D. the monopoly of big data by tech giants.
答案
D
解析
根据第三段第三句话中提及提到“正真的问题在于,他们都属于私有的垄断企业”,即这些相关的数据是垄断问题就成了核心问题。因此D选项符合题意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/xueli/2698868.html
本试题收录于:
英语一研究生题库研究生入学分类
英语一研究生
研究生入学
相关试题推荐
Anyfair-mindedassessmentofthedanger
Anyfair-mindedassessmentofthedanger
Anyfair-mindedassessmentofthedanger
Anyfair-mindedassessmentofthedanger
Anyfair-mindedassessmentofthedanger
随机试题
LatinAmericanandChineseofficialshaveopenedtwodaysoftalksontradea
Athirdofbreadscontainmoresaltthanrecommendedunderguidelinesbeing
ThePurposeofLiteraryAnalysisI.Introduction—makingr
Whatdowemeanbybeing’talented’or’gifted’?Themostobviouswayisto
砌体结构的缺点有()。Ⅰ.自重大;Ⅱ.砌筑工作繁重;Ⅲ,黏土砖用量大,耗费大
1985年我国学者编制了“生活事件评定量表”,其中LCU分值最高的生活事件是(
脊髓半侧损害综合征又称Brown-Sequard综合征,下列临床特点中不正确的是
由资本资产定价模型的假设可以得出()。A.投资者是理性的 B.每个投资
某房地产企业拟建一项目,总投资20000万元,建设期3年,建设完成后用于出租,从
结核菌素试验注射后,观察结果的时间为A:12小时 B:12~24小时 C:2
最新回复
(
0
)