首页
登录
公务员类
The world is going through the biggest w
The world is going through the biggest w
最全题库
2022-08-02
34
问题
The world is going through the biggest wave of mergers and acquisitions ever witnessed. The process sweeps from hyperactive America to Europe and reaches the emerging countries with unsurpassed might. Many in these countries are looking at this process and worrying: “Won’t the wave of business concentration turn into an uncontrollable anti-competitive force?” There’s no question that the big are getting bigger and more powerful. Multinational corporations accounted for less than 20% of international trade in 1982. Today the figure is more than 25% and growing rapidly. International affiliates account for a fast-growing segment of production in economies that open up and welcome foreign investment. In Argentina, for instance, after the reforms of the early 1990s, multinationals went from 43% to almost 70% of the industrial production of the 200 largest firms. This phenomenon has created serious concerns over the role of smaller economic firms, of national businessmen and over the ultimate stability, of the world economy. I believe that the most important forces behind the massive M&A wave are the same that underlie the globalization process: falling transportation, and communication costs, lower trade and investment barriers and enlarged markets that require enlarged operations capable of meeting customers’ demands. All these are beneficial, not detrimental to consumers. As productivity grows, the world’s wealth increases. Examples of benefits or costs of the current concentration-wave are scanty. Yet it is hard to imagine that the merge of a few oil firms today could recreate the same threats to competition that were feared nearly a century ago in the U.S., when the Standard Oil trust was broken up. The mergers of telecom companies, such as World Corn, hardly seem to bring higher prices for consumers or a reduction in the pace of technical progress. On the contrary, the price of communications is coming down fast. In cars, too, concentration is increasing—witness Daimler and Chrysler, Renault and Nissan—but it does not appear that consumers am being hurt. Yet the fact remains that the merger movement must be watched. A few weeks ago, Alan Greenspan warned against the megamergers in the banking industry. Who is going to supervise, regulate and operate, as lender of last resort with the gigantic banks that are being created? won’t multinationals shift production from one place to another when a nation gets too strict about infringements to fair corn petition? And should one country take upon itself the role of “defending competition” on issues that affect many other nations, as in the U.S.Practice?4 The world is going through the biggest wave of mergers and acquisitions ever witnessed. The process sweeps from hyperactive America to Europe and reaches the emerging countries with unsurpassed might. Many in these countries are looking at this process and worrying: “Won’t the wave of business concentration turn into an uncontrollable anti-competitive force?” There’s no question that the big are getting bigger and more powerful. Multinational corporations accounted for less than 20% of international trade in 1982. Today the figure is more than 25% and growing rapidly. International affiliates account for a fast-growing segment of production in economies that open up and welcome foreign investment. In Argentina, for instance, after the reforms of the early 1990s, multinationals went from 43% to almost 70% of the industrial production of the 200 largest firms. This phenomenon has created serious concerns over the role of smaller economic firms, of national businessmen and over the ultimate stability, of the world economy. I believe that the most important forces behind the massive M&A wave are the same that underlie the globalization process: falling transportation, and communication costs, lower trade and investment barriers and enlarged markets that require enlarged operations capable of meeting customers’ demands. All these are beneficial, not detrimental to consumers. As productivity grows, the world’s wealth increases. Examples of benefits or costs of the current concentration-wave are scanty. Yet it is hard to imagine that the merge of a few oil firms today could recreate the same threats to competition that were feared nearly a century ago in the U.S., when the Standard Oil trust was broken up. The mergers of telecom companies, such as World Corn, hardly seem to bring higher prices for consumers or a reduction in the pace of technical progress. On the contrary, the price of communications is coming down fast. In cars, too, concentration is increasing—witness Daimler and Chrysler, Renault and Nissan—but it does not appear that consumers am being hurt. Yet the fact remains that the merger movement must be watched. A few weeks ago, Alan Greenspan warned against the megamergers in the banking industry. Who is going to supervise, regulate and operate, as lender of last resort with the gigantic banks that are being created? won’t multinationals shift production from one place to another when a nation gets too strict about infringements to fair corn petition? And should one country take upon itself the role of “defending competition” on issues that affect many other nations, as in the U.S.What is the typical trend, of businesses today?A.the increasing concentration is certain to hurt consumersB.World Corn serves as a good example of both benefits and costsC.the costs of the globalization process are enormousD.the Standard Oil trust might have threatened competition
选项
A.the increasing concentration is certain to hurt consumers
B.World Corn serves as a good example of both benefits and costs
C.the costs of the globalization process are enormous
D.the Standard Oil trust might have threatened competition
答案
D
解析
根据第四段“Yet it is hard to imagine that the merge of a few oil...when the Standard Oil trust was broken up”“很难想象如今一些石油公司的合并会再次给竞争带来威胁。而这种威胁在一个世纪前标准石油垄断被打破时就引起美国的担忧了。”因此可以得出答案为D项“标准石油垄断可能威胁到了竞争”。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/gongwuyuan/2635154.html
本试题收录于:
英语言文学 军队文职题库军队文职人员招聘分类
英语言文学 军队文职
军队文职人员招聘
相关试题推荐
Whendaylightcame_____throughthewin
Thecolor_____fromyellowthroughgree
Theworldisgoingthroughthebiggestw
Theworldisgoingthroughthebiggestw
Theworldisgoingthroughthebiggestw
Theworldisgoingthroughthebiggestw
Theworldisgoingthroughthebiggestw
Theshuttersstood(),andthroughoneof
Theshuttersstood(),andthroughoneof
随机试题
Fordecades,thedebateaboutbalancingworkandfamilylifehasbeenframed
WhenaNewYorkerwashikinginEurope,hisSwissfriendkeptsaying"Listen
下列关于精液说法错误的是A.正常精液pH为7.0~7.8 B.正常形态精子占5
(2014年)公司出现解散事由,应按规定进行清算。下列关于清算组活动规则的说法中
单子叶植物根及根茎类药材断面可见的环纹是A:纤维群B:木质部C:石细胞层D
下列各项中,不属于会计估计的是( )。A.固定资产的初始计量 B.建造合同履
为急性胰腺炎患者解除疼痛,不能使用的药物是A:山莨菪碱 B:吗啡 C:阿托品
如图所示,已知钢筋混凝士过梁净跨ln=3.0m,过梁上砌体高度1.2m,墙厚19
法的确认、分配、衡量、保护和认识性价值,被统称为法的工具性价值。()
单纯性肾病综合征常见病理类型是A.微小病变 B.非微小病变 C.膜性肾病
最新回复
(
0
)