首页
登录
职称英语
It is hard to predict how science is going to turn out, and if it is really
It is hard to predict how science is going to turn out, and if it is really
游客
2025-04-06
41
管理
问题
It is hard to predict how science is going to turn out, and if it is really good science it is impossible to predict. If the things to be found are actually new, they are by definition unknown in advance. You cannot make choices in this matter. You either have science or you don’t, and if you have it you are obliged to accept the surprising and disturbing pieces of information, along with the neat and promptly useful bits.
The only solid piece of scientific truth about which I feel totally confident is that we are profoundly ignorant about nature. Indeed, I regard this as the major discovery of the past hundred years of biology. It is, in its way, an illuminating piece of news. It would have amazed the brightest minds of the 18th century Enlightenment to be told by any of us how little we know and how bewildering seems the way ahead. It is this sudden confrontation with the depth and scope of ignorance that represents the most significant contribution of the 20th century science to the human intellect. In earlier times, we either pretended to understand how things worked or ignored the problem, or simply made up stories to fill the gaps.
Now that we have begun exploring in earnest, we are getting glimpses of how huge the questions are, and how far from being answered. Because of this, we are depressed. It is not so bad being ignorant if you are totally ignorant; the hard thing is knowing in some detail the reality of ignorance, the worst spots and here and there the not-so-bad spots, but no true light at the end of the tunnel nor even any tunnels that can yet be trusted.
But we are making a beginning, and there ought to be some satisfaction. There are probably no questions we can think up that can’t be answered, sooner or later, including even the matter of consciousness. To be sure, there may well be questions we can’t think up, ever and therefore limits to the reach of human intellect, but that is another matter. Within our limits, we should be able to work our way through to all our answers, if we keep at it long enough, and pay attention. [br] Which of the following statements is NOT true of scientists in earlier times?
选项
A、They invented false theories to explain things they didn’t understand.
B、They falsely claimed to know all about nature.
C、They did not believe in results from scientific observation.
D、They paid little attention to the problems they didn’t understand.
答案
C
解析
细节判断题。根据题干关键词scientists in earlier times定位到原文第二段尾句。原句中的eitherpretended to understand how things worked(假装知道事物如何发展),or ignored the problem(忽略这些问题),or simply made up stories to fill the gaps(编造一些故事来进行解释)分别与选项B、D、A的内容对应,只有选项C的内容未提到。故答案为C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/4029469.html
相关试题推荐
Itishardtopredicthowscienceisgoingtoturnout,andifitisreally
Itishardtopredicthowscienceisgoingtoturnout,andifitisreally
MichaelYessis,anemeritusprofessorofSportsScienceatCaliforniaState
MichaelYessis,anemeritusprofessorofSportsScienceatCaliforniaState
Scienceisadominantthemeinourculture.Sinceittouchesalmosteveryfa
Scienceisadominantthemeinourculture.Sinceittouchesalmosteveryfa
Scienceisadominantthemeinourculture.Sinceittouchesalmosteveryfa
You’rebusyfillingouttheapplicationformforapositionyoureallyneed;
You’rebusyfillingouttheapplicationformforapositionyoureallyneed;
Scienceisanenterpriseconcernedwithgaininginformationaboutcausality,
随机试题
CorporateCrimeOverdecadesofyears,corporatecrimeh
WelcometoVirginiaPleasecometofeelthewarmtho
StartyouressaywithabriefdescriptionofthepictureandthencommentonLov
UML图中,一张交互图显示一个交互,由一组对象及其之间的关系组成,包含它们
陈丽君为代表的“陈派评书”,作品包括()。A.《大西唐》 B.《曹家将》 C
下列各项,不会造成虚假舌象的是()A.牙齿残缺 B.自然光线 C.饮用
Thechangeinthatvillagewasmiraculou
下列城市中,2011年中秋、国庆黄金周期间旅游总收入最少的是:() A.天
各级政府对同级公安机关的领导,是通过行政命令保证党的路线、方针、政策、重大决策的
女,24岁。腹痛、腹泻、便秘交替2年。大便无脓血和黏液。近1年来消瘦、乏力、贫血
最新回复
(
0
)