2. 职称英语
  3. Early intelligence tests were not without their critics. Man enduring concer

Early intelligence tests were not without their critics. Man enduring concer

游客2024-04-26  103
问题     Early intelligence tests were not without their critics. Man enduring concerns were first raised by the influential journalist Walter Lippman, in a series of published debates with Lewis Terman, of Stanford University, the father of IQ testing in America. Lippman pointed out the superficiality of the questions, their possible cultural biases, and the risks of trying to determine a person’s intellectual potential with a brief oral or paper-and-pencil measure.
    Perhaps surprisingly, the conceptualization of intelligence did not advance much in the decades following Terman’s pioneering contributions. Intelligence tests came to be seen, rightly or wrongly, as primarily a tool for selecting people to fill academic or vocational niches. In one of the most famous remarks about intelligence testing, the influential Harvard psychologist E. G. Boring declared, "Intelligence is what the tests test." So long as these tests did what they were supposed to do(that is, give some indication of school success), it did not seem necessary or prudent to probe too deeply into their meaning or to explore alternative views of the human intellect.
    Psychologists who study intelligence have argued chiefly about two questions. The first: Is intelligence singular, or does it consist of various more or less independent intellectual faculties? The purists — ranging from the turn-of-the-century English psychologist Charles Spearman to his latter-day disciples Richard J. Herrntein and Charles Murray — defend the notion of a single overarching "g". The pluralists — ranging from L. L. Thurstone, of the University of Chicargo, who posited seven vectors of the mind, to J. P. Guilford, of the University of Southern California, who discerned 150 factors of the intellect — construe intelligence as composed of some or even many dissociable components.
    The public is more interested in the second question: Is intelligence(or are intelligences)largely inherited? This is by and large a Western question. In the Confucian societies of East Asia individual differences in endowment are assumed to be modest, and differences in achievement are thought to be due largely to effort. In the West, however, many students of the subject sympathize with the view that intelligence is inborn and one can do little to alter one’s intellectual birthright.
    Studies of identical twins reared apart provide surprisingly strong support for the "heritability" of psychometric intelligence. That is, if one wants to predict someone’s score on an intelligence test, the scores of the biological parents(even if the child has not had appreciable contact with them)are more likely to prove relevant than the scores of the adoptive parents. By the same token, the IQs of identical twins are more similar than the IQs of fraternal twins. And, contrary to common sense, the IQs of biologically related people grow closer in the later years of life. [br] Walter Lippman’s idea about the early intelligence tests by Lewis Terman is that______.
选项 A、the testing questions are good enough to show the testers’ intellectual potential
B、the testing questions vary too much from one culture to another
C、the usability of the testing questions should be questioned
D、the testing questions are beyond human being’s reach
答案 C
解析 根据题干中的Walter Lippman和Lewis Terman将本题出处定位于第1段。该段最后一句指出，瓦尔特·李普曼认为路易斯·特曼所创造的智力测试题存在不足之处：thesuperficiality of the questions(问题的肤浅性)，their possible cultural biases(问题可能存在文化偏见)，the risks of trying to…(仅通过简单的口试和笔试就决定一个人的智力潜力)。C)项是对the superficiality of the quest
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3572694.html
相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)