首页
登录
职称英语
Despite the brouhaha(骚动)over stolen e-mails from the University of East Angl
Despite the brouhaha(骚动)over stolen e-mails from the University of East Angl
游客
2024-02-07
59
管理
问题
Despite the brouhaha(骚动)over stolen e-mails from the University of East Anglia, the science of climate change is well enough established by now that we can move on to the essential question: what’s the damage going to be?
The total bill, if emissions are left unchecked, could reach 20 percent of annual per capita income, says Nicholas Stern, the British economist who led an influential Whitehall-sponsored study. William Nordhaus, a Yale economist, puts his "best guess" at 2. 5 percent of yearly global GDP. And according to Dutch economist Richard Tol, the economic impact of a century’s worth of climate change is "relatively small" and "comparable to the impact of one or two years of economic growth. "
These estimates aren’t just different—they’re different by an order of magnitude. And while some might dismiss the cost estimates as mere intellectual exercises, they’re intellectual exercises with real impact. The Copenhagen meeting may be a bust, but countries from the United States to China are individually considering cap-and-trade schemes, carbon taxes, and other policies aimed at curtailing greenhouse gases. To be effective, a tax or cap-and-trade charge would have to force today’s emitters to pay the true "social cost of carbon"—in other words, the amount of damage a ton of carbon will cause in the coming centuries.
Figuring out what that cost is, however, is no simple task. That’s largely because most of the bill won’t come due for many decades. A ton of carbon dioxide emitted today will linger in the air for anywhere from one to five centuries. Virtually every cost study shows that, even if economic growth continues apace(快速地)and there’s no effort to slash emissions, the damage from climate change will be negligible until at least 2075. It could take 100 years before we see noticeably negative effects, and even more before we need to launch massive construction projects to mitigate(减轻)the damage. [br] What can we learn about the present climate change?
选项
A、Its damage is exaggerated to some extent.
B、Actions should be taken the moment people realize it.
C、Measures should be taken immediately to deal with it.
D、The negative effect will not be significant in this century.
答案
D
解析
综合理解题。根据定位句可知,气候变化带来的影响至少要到2075年才会显现,而显著的负面影响在100年之后才能够看到,更多年后我们才会发起大规模建设项目来减轻这种损失。故D)“本世纪负面影响都不会很明显”为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3430349.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]"Whereistheuniversity?"isaquestionmanyvisitorstoCam
[originaltext]M:I’veheardthemodernartexhibitionintheuniversitymuseum
[originaltext]M:I’veheardthemodernartexhibitionintheuniversitymuseum
[originaltext]M:I’veheardthemodernartexhibitionintheuniversitymuseum
[originaltext]M:I’veheardthemodernartexhibitionintheuniversitymuseum
[originaltext]M:I’veheardthemodernartexhibitionintheuniversitymuseum
[originaltext]M:I’veheardthemodernartexhibitionintheuniversitymuseum
[originaltext]WhenshegraduatesfromColumbiaUniversitynextyearwitha
[originaltext]WhenshegraduatesfromColumbiaUniversitynextyearwitha
[originaltext]WhenshegraduatesfromColumbiaUniversitynextyearwitha
随机试题
PeoplecelebrateMother’sDayandFather’sDaybecause______.[br]Theunderlin
Whatisthenextnumberinthissequence:3,12,60,360,...?2520(数列后项与前项的商依次是4
【B1】[br]【B2】[audioFiles]audio_eufm_j09_007(20082)[/audioFiles]produce
AfterthreeyearsatNewYorkUniversity,Ileftatthetimetotakeasix-m
[originaltext]M:Cathy,chaostheoryseemstobeabranchofphysicsormathema
(2018年)2018年3月,某化工生产企业以委托加工收回的已税高档化妆品为原料
患者,女性,30岁,经胃镜检查确诊为慢性胃炎,查幽门螺杆菌阳性。治疗药物中不包括
目前已知的最强的致泻毒素是A:Vero细胞毒素B:霍乱肠毒素C:耐热性肠毒素
肺炎球菌肺炎患者其痰液呈()。A.黏液痰 B.铁锈色痰 C.大量脓痰分三层
根据我国《民事诉讼法》的规定,人民检察院对民事案件进行抗诉,正确的是:()
最新回复
(
0
)